Second Opinions in Prostate Cancer

Posted by rick137 @rick137, May 11, 2024

This is a solicitation for second opinions related to all aspects of prostate cancer, i.e. MRI, pathology, scans, treatment pathways, ...
If there are previous discussions on this topic they could be listed in a post.

I am starting this discussion not because I have either sought or had a second opinion. However, resources for a second opinion is money in the bank.

Free form as usual but why you asked for a second opinion, what for, the difference between the original and second opinion, which opinion was chosen, and the outcome would seem relevant.

Implicitly, Mayo Clinic Connect is a source for second opinions every day.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@ppettis

Thanks for the input. Did you have any incontinence or ED issues? How was the procedure itself and do you have anyone to recommend for the procedure? Thanks in advance.

Jump to this post

I had it done at Mayo Rochester by David Woodrum, Radiologist. Zero issues with side effects. I had 30% of my 45 cc prostate ablated. I had zero pain and did not even take a Tylenol. I walked 2 miles the day after and started sex again at one week. You can read my description of the procedure if you click on my profile.

REPLY
@workmanbiff

Hi everyone -
Husband was diagnosed with Stage 3 on 4/15/25 by a local urologist (we are located in upstate NY) from a biopsy. Two opinions were obtained - local pathologist and 2nd from Michigan State.
We forwarded the results to MSK for their evaluation.
An MRI was Done (locally) /Pet Scan Done (locally)/Decipher Test (MSK)- Is in Process
MSK has all those test results.
We are in consultation with both the MSK Chief of Radiology. He is advising Hormone Therapy and 26 days of Radiation. And the MSK Chief of Urology Service to determine our course of action.
The surgical consult date is June 16th.
Husband is 72 years old and has a family history of cancer - mother, father and both sisters.
Kindest thanks for any words of wisdom . . . I am very grateful for this site.
Best,
=========================================
MSK Pathology Report:
Final Diagnosis
1. Prostate, R ant med; biopsy (HS25-000493, A, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP)
2. Prostate, R post med; biopsy (HS25-000493, B, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025:
Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade: Grade Group 3 (Gleason score 4+3=7) Percentage of pattern 4/5: 55%
Number of cores involved: 2 out of 3
Tumor length: 6.5 mm
Percentage of tissue involved by tumor: 35% Cribriform pattern 4: Not identified Perineural invasion is present
3. Prostate, left base; biopsy (HS25-000493, C, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025:
Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade: Grade Group 2 (Gleason score 3+4=7) Percentage of pattern 4/5: 5%
Number of cores involved: 1 out of 1
Tumor length: 3.5 mm
Percentage of tissue involved by tumor: 30% Cribriform pattern 4: Not identified
4. Prostate, L post med; biopsy (HS25-000493, D, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025:
Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade: Grade Group 1 (Gleason score 3+3=6) Number of cores involved: 1 out of 1
Tumor length: 0.4 mm
Percentage of tissue involved by tumor: 3%
Results
New Clinical Information
5. Prostate, L ant med; biopsy (HS25-000493, E, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025:
Benign prostatic tissue
Benign prostatic tissue
6. Prostate, R ant lat; biopsy (HS25-000493, F, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025:
Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade: Grade Group 3 (Gleason score 4+3=7) Percentage of pattern 4/5: 55%
Number of cores involved: 1 out of 1
Tumor length: 1.8 mm
Percentage of tissue involved by tumor: 15% Cribriform pattern 4: Identified
7. Prostate, R lat post MRI lesion; biopsy (HS25-000493, G, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025:
Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade: Grade Group 3 (Gleason score 4+3=7) Percentage of pattern 4/5: 80%
Number of cores involved: 3 out of 3
Tumor length: 9 mm
Percentage of tissue involved by tumor: 80% Cribriform pattern 4: Identified
Perineural invasion is present
8. Prostate, right base; biopsy (HS25-000493, H, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025: Benign prostatic tissue
9. Prostate, L ant lat; biopsy (HS25-000493, I, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025: Benign prostatic tissue
10. Prostate, L post lat; biopsy (HS25-000493, J, 1 H&E); Collected: 3/26/2025: Benign prostatic tissue

Jump to this post

Hi workmanbiff, I just completed the same regimen at Sloan, although for salvage radiation ((surgery 2019).
Your husband’s biopsy is eerily similar to mine in that there was a lot of G4+3 in the gland. However, the presence of cribriform cells in one sample is concerning.
That’s an aggressive form that does not respond as readily to radiation as adeno/acinar cells.
You might ask about an HDR brachytherapy ‘boost’ (seed placement) prior to the 26 sessions.
During my stay at Sloan in Commack I met 3 men who had this done in conjunction with 5 visits of Cyberknife ( not 26 of IMRT).
Sloan is one of the best but you MUST ASK QUESTIONS!! My first RO (chief also) was an older man who did things the old fashioned way; didn’t care for his approach.
My next was a young, dynamic, tech savvy guy- Dr Andrew Barsky - who was up on all the latest research and tailored my treatment from 39 visits to 25 and 6 months Orgovyx.
You gotta do this the best way possible the FIRST time, because when radiation treatment fails it usually involves a lifetime of hormones and whack a mole SBRT treatments. Best of luck to you!
Phil

REPLY
@heavyphil

Hi workmanbiff, I just completed the same regimen at Sloan, although for salvage radiation ((surgery 2019).
Your husband’s biopsy is eerily similar to mine in that there was a lot of G4+3 in the gland. However, the presence of cribriform cells in one sample is concerning.
That’s an aggressive form that does not respond as readily to radiation as adeno/acinar cells.
You might ask about an HDR brachytherapy ‘boost’ (seed placement) prior to the 26 sessions.
During my stay at Sloan in Commack I met 3 men who had this done in conjunction with 5 visits of Cyberknife ( not 26 of IMRT).
Sloan is one of the best but you MUST ASK QUESTIONS!! My first RO (chief also) was an older man who did things the old fashioned way; didn’t care for his approach.
My next was a young, dynamic, tech savvy guy- Dr Andrew Barsky - who was up on all the latest research and tailored my treatment from 39 visits to 25 and 6 months Orgovyx.
You gotta do this the best way possible the FIRST time, because when radiation treatment fails it usually involves a lifetime of hormones and whack a mole SBRT treatments. Best of luck to you!
Phil

Jump to this post

Thank you for your insight Phil.
We just received the Decipher test results this morning - which is 0.95 high.
Have a consult with MSK surgeon on June 16th for his surgical recommendations.
Once we hear from him we can determine the best course of action.
So appreciate your reply . . . and to know that we are not alone in this journey.
Best,
glo

REPLY
@workmanbiff

Thank you for your insight Phil.
We just received the Decipher test results this morning - which is 0.95 high.
Have a consult with MSK surgeon on June 16th for his surgical recommendations.
Once we hear from him we can determine the best course of action.
So appreciate your reply . . . and to know that we are not alone in this journey.
Best,
glo

Jump to this post

Glo, that Decipher IS concerning, and echoes the finding of cribriform cells, which are very aggressive.
I posted 2 links yesterday to questions about IDC (intraductal cells/cribriform go hand in hand) on the forum. One said that successful treatment usually involves surgery followed by radiation (25-39 sessions) with ADT.
I know that some would prefer to do surgery and then monitor PSA to see where it goes. That might work in a less aggressive case but IMO (not an oncologist, but a patient who ultimately needed SRT anyway with much lower risk factors) I would hit this hard and not give it a chance to spread.
Of course, surgical pathology will be the true indicator of the severity of his disease, along with lymph node examination. Just be aware that surgeons can sometimes be cocky, claiming ‘we got it all’ and no need to worry about next steps; Sloan is probably more of a collaborative effort, with one department conferring with another - but I would still seek an RO’s opinion after the surgery to see if they recommend further treatment.
RO’s see all the surgical ‘failures’ and know which factors were probably responsible for the cancer returning. Best,
Phil

REPLY
@colleenyoung

@rick137, there have quite a few great replies to the discussion you started here. Are you getting the information you were looking for? What question remain?

Jump to this post

I know this thread is a bit old but I'm having a hard time finding someone to give me a second opinion on my Biopsy Results.
Everywhere I look I find people saying get a second read, confirm your working with the right Gleason score. But HOW is not so easy!

REPLY
@joel66

I know this thread is a bit old but I'm having a hard time finding someone to give me a second opinion on my Biopsy Results.
Everywhere I look I find people saying get a second read, confirm your working with the right Gleason score. But HOW is not so easy!

Jump to this post

You call a hospital or cancer center and ask them. It will involve the signing of various forms - consent, release, HIPPA, etc. I did this twice.
Phil

REPLY
@joel66

I know this thread is a bit old but I'm having a hard time finding someone to give me a second opinion on my Biopsy Results.
Everywhere I look I find people saying get a second read, confirm your working with the right Gleason score. But HOW is not so easy!

Jump to this post

I reached out to Hopkins and they were willing to look at everything I had. I did have to get lab reports and films to them But was able to do this online

REPLY

I had mine done at VCU by a genitourinary cancer specialist. One of two CCC's in Va. The reason: I lost confidence in my SO due to being evasive and not providing the answers I was seeking. He obtained biopsy and all relevant data and told me my story. Ended with "I only work with stage 4 patients and frankly do not find you that interesting." At that point I busted out laughing nodding my head and told him how glad I was that he didn't find me interesting, along with the other two in the room. He gave me a 70-30% chance of never having to revisit this again. Also told me to not get a PSA test until 6 months after ADT and to come see him if my PSA jumps to 2 and they will find it and treat it. Currently my psa is undetectable on ADT. Stated my greatest risk at this point is being over treated. Interesting conversation to say the least.

REPLY
@edinmaryland

I reached out to Hopkins and they were willing to look at everything I had. I did have to get lab reports and films to them But was able to do this online

Jump to this post

What were the charges?
I am looking to have someone look at my past MRIs and see what an "expert" thinks is happening, or not happening.

REPLY
@eddy1954

What were the charges?
I am looking to have someone look at my past MRIs and see what an "expert" thinks is happening, or not happening.

Jump to this post

I am a Hopkin's patient so there was no charge at all. I believe- at least in Maryland, you can request a new pt appointment with a Hopkins specialist, and then request a second opinion. My insurance (Cigna but I had Blue Cross before) was accepted so there was no out of pocket expenses or even a co-payment. Again, I may have had some advantage since I was already an established Hopkin's patient.
Why not go to the Hopkins website and see if you can schedule an appointment with the urology department and see what happens

At one point, I also get another opinion from Georgetown. I scheduled online and had a video session

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.