← Return to Salvage radiation decision: with or without hormone therapy?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

I’ve read that the FDG (Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose) PET/CT scan being glucose-based, is great for brain, lung, lymphoma, and some other cancers that gobble up glucose for energy, but for prostate cancers (which gobble up testosterone for energy), it doesn’t work as well unless the prostate cancer is very aggressive.

Drs Moyad and Scholz discussed this at a PCRI conference a few years ago: https://youtu.be/-PyqazlkpCE?si=IQ3BCWkZqVkloCiC

And Dr Scholz here: https://youtu.be/zwvGb8XGDqg?si=YKMym483RGQmzu0a

The Axumin (F18-Fluciclovine) PET/CT scan is different. The Axumin scan works by exploiting the fact that prostate cancers absorb amino acids at a much more rapid pace than normal cells. Axumin is made up of a radioactive tracer linked to an amino acid. Cancer cells absorb the amino acids more avidly than normal cells, so when Axumin is used, the radioactive tracer concentrates inside the tumor cells. When the patient is imaged, the areas that have a high concentration of the imaging agent signal the location of the cancer in the patient’s body.

All this stuff I’m learning, I hope I never have to use!

Jump to this post


Replies to "I’ve read that the FDG (Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose) PET/CT scan being glucose-based, is great for brain, lung, lymphoma,..."

Interesting, I found this contrary information. Let’s make this complicated! Don’t we love it when the experts disagree.

For prostate cancer that doesn't produce much PSMA, FDG PET/CT is often a good alternative for imaging, according to UroToday.com and the National Institutes of Health. FDG PET/CT uses a radioactive tracer that highlights areas of high glucose metabolism, which can be indicative of cancer spread, even if PSMA isn't expressed. While Axumin and C-11 choline PET scans are also options, they may not be as widely available or as effective as FDG PET/CT in this scenario.