← Return to HoLEP vs TURP: Looking for guidance
DiscussionHoLEP vs TURP: Looking for guidance
Men's Health | Last Active: Jun 17 6:43am | Replies (45)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Hello, @jyuhanick. I hope to be of some help to you in deciding about how to..."
@tlk1951, you raise a good question about whether morcellation might be used in your laser surgery using HoLEP to remove excess prostate tissue. The answer must come from the physician who knows -- your Mayo surgeon.
In my case, a large piece of my prostate was cut up and removed through my urethra in a TURP procedure over 9 years ago. A small malignant tumor on my bladder lining (hidden by the excess prostate tissue) also was removed, and six weeks later a dozen more small tumors on the lining of the bladder were removed in a TURB procedure. Since then (over 8 years) periodic cystoscope examinations of my bladder and urethra have detected no new tumors, and those exams are now performed once a year.
I don't know of any comments by Mayo physicians on the Prevention article, but I'm confident that no medical teams are better than those at Mayo to answer your question. I know that your urologist will provide any information you feel the need for before you undergo the HoLEP procedure in February. Best wishes for a successful procedure. Please remember that we'll be rooting for you.
Martin
Unfortunately, there's no other way to bring the prostate out through the urethra. However, the outcome is not as equal as to say, if it were another procedure that missed the tumor.
After HoLEP, the chunks of prostate that were initially cut and pushed into the bladder are morcellated AFTER they are aspirated through the morcelletor scope, not morcellated within the bladder. The bladder is then irrigated for 24 hours with liquid, removing clots and remnants, not all. So, anything is possible, but the other risks of bleeding, transfusion to name a few are less with HoLEP. The morcellated prostate is the ultimate biopsy because they have the entire prostate to study rather than core samples that can miss something as small as mine at 0.5 mm. Also, the risks and complications of the transrectal biopsy are eliminated in the scenario, bleeding, infection, sepsis and elevated PSA.
I'm glad you posted that link, because as I mentioned in my post holep prostate pathology, 0.5mm tumor can still spread in a highly vascular area, and that part of the prostate can infiltrate the blood supply in the bladder, or through the capsule, especially if the surgeon is not skilled. Otherwise, I would do HoLEP again, if I had the choice. It appeared to be the best option for me.
@predictable Has any doctor from the Mayo Clinic commented on this article as it might relate to a HoLEP procedure? The article focuses on morecellation of the uterus with pieces floating throughout the body. In the case of HoLEP, the pieces are pretty contained in the bladder and are immediately flushed out. Might that make a difference?