← Return to Questions about Active Surveillance as a treatment option
DiscussionQuestions about Active Surveillance as a treatment option
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Jun 4 4:41pm | Replies (28)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Hi, My husband was 3+3 Gleason initially and AS was the recommended action by our health..."
Not sure you know, but the PET scan cannot see metastasis smaller than 2.7 mm and if they’re 5 mm and smaller, they may not be able to be seen. This leaves a lot of people having to wait until their metastasis get bigger to treat them, Or do salvage radiation which works for some people.
Hopefully he is getting PSA tests every three months or so. With a 4+3 you never know, especially with cribriform.
Well, I realize that ADT is not “fun” You could live another decade, or more, by taking the no fun drugs. I’ve had PC for 15 years and I’ve taken ADT for eight of them. The side effects are a hell of a lot better than death.
And if he wants to not be uncomfortable, Then don’t die of prostate cancer. It is extremely painful and for the last month or two you will be unable to actually communicate much, because the drugs for the pain take away ability to Communicate effectively.
Thanks for sharing this story about your husband. It demonstrates that you must advocate for yourself and make your treatment decision based on lots of information and involve lots of medical opinions. May the treatments work and you have many more years with your husband!