Thanks for the interest.... It isn't too hard to figure out both on symptoms and imaging. Post Tulsa the size should have gone down to around 40 or 50 cc in my case and from descriptions of procedure (not from imaging which there isn't one a few months post Tulsa). That from 110 cc. So I pee'd great. But over last 1.5 years the getting up at night to pee increased. The need to go after you just went came back a bit. Jan '25 MRI size listed as 87 cc, up from post tulsa recovery which I don't have a size I will call it 50 cc. Nothing suspicious cancer wise noted on MRI, but MRI does point out BPH seems active. I just had a CT of pelvis for possible PAE and size listed as 90 to 95 cc (one place it mentions 92 and in text it says 95). So symptoms, imaging all point to BPH. I read lots of tulsa info, sometimes it stops BPH, sometimes it can't really stop BPH. But obviously the important one is cancer.