Replies to Thanks for your response, Clarification is due here, my PSA (ultrasensitive) was done in Dec 24,(2.03)…

Discussion

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Apr 26 6:38pm | Replies (30)

Comment receiving replies

@mauk

Thanks for your response, Clarification is due here, my PSA (ultrasensitive) was done in Dec 24,(2.03) and my HoLEP in March 25, the oncology urologist is taking an approach Decipher, PSMA PET/MRI, and MR pelvis with and without contrast with a follow-up with PSA before mid-June for 6 weeks follow-up. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Anyone know how the urology staff is at UCSF?

Jump to this post

Replies to "Thanks for your response, Clarification is due here, my PSA (ultrasensitive) was done in Dec 24,(2.03)..."

surftohealth88 | @surftohealth88 | Apr 22 10:05pm

"Anyone know how the urology staff is at UCSF?"

UCSF - so far SLOW, unresponsive and ambiguous. Had to call about 20 times and still no "second opinion" on pathology or PSMA !!! It has been about 5 weeks since we sent slides for second opinion *eye roll
We called Stanford yesterday just to "ask" about TULSA (probably we are not good candidates but just had enough of being sitting duck ), lady that answered immediately accessed all results and told us that she will present those to comity of 4 or 5 doctors ( I forgot number) and that they will do evaluation and CALL US !?! I was floored ! Like day and night .
Anyhow, maybe you will have more luck. If we were not soooo focused on RP and success rate there for that procedure , we would probably pick up and fold out tent long time ago.

I am especially upset since our slides are now "stuck there" and we wanted to hear third opinion - but we have consultations soon so we will endure *sigh They promised to "digitalize them" and nothing happened in that regard either.

VIEW AND REPLY