Fifteen Years of PCa Treatment Progress - and the next 15 Years

Posted by hans_casteels @hanscasteels, Apr 9 9:27am

Fifteen years ago, a prostate cancer diagnosis came with two immediate options: radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation. Both were effective-ish, depending on the stage. Both also carried an unspoken agreement: you might live, but sex and continence would be sacrificed to the gods of early detection.

Back then, imaging was vague, biopsies were random, and “watchful waiting” was medical code for “let’s hope you die of something else first.” PSA testing was under fire for causing too much anxiety, even though it was pretty much the only early warning system anyone had. You got the diagnosis, then you played Russian roulette with your treatment options. If you were lucky, you just lost your erections. If you weren’t, you got a colostomy bag and a second opinion that started with “we should’ve...”

Now? Now it’s different.

First off, diagnostics have become smarter. We have multiparametric MRIs that can actually see what they’re poking at, instead of stabbing blindly into the gland like it owes someone money. We’ve got PSMA PET scans that can light up cancer cells with eerie precision. Biopsies are now targeted, not just twelve random cores taken like shotgun pellets. It’s a small miracle: we can now diagnose the thing without also maiming you in the process.

As for treatment—yes, it still sucks, but it sucks with options. External beam radiation has gone from daily carpet bombing to finely tuned, image-guided precision hits. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), and brachytherapy now deliver a one-two punch with fewer side effects. Fewer, not none. Your rectum and bladder may still file complaints, but at least they don’t need trauma counseling.

Then there’s hormone therapy. Fifteen years ago, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) mostly meant Lupron—a shot that turned off your testosterone like flipping a breaker and hoped you wouldn’t completely unravel. Today, we’ve got Firmagon (degarelix), Orgovyx (relugolix), and second-generation anti-androgens like darolutamide, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. They’re more targeted, work faster, and are being combined in smarter ways to delay resistance. You still get hot flashes, brain fog, and emotional volatility that makes you cry at insurance commercials—but again, you live longer. Progress.

We’re not just nuking the cancer anymore. We're stratifying risk, tailoring treatment, and using genetic testing—BRCA mutations, for example—to guide whether someone should get additional therapies like PARP inhibitors. PARP inhibitors, by the way, didn’t even exist in this space 15 years ago. Now they’re giving guys with aggressive mutations a fighting chance. And let's not forget immunotherapy, which is inching its way into prostate cancer’s rigid walls. Sipuleucel-T was the first, and newer agents are being tested in combo trials as we speak.

So yes, I’ve had the scans, the needles, the seeds, the shots. I’ve joined the ranks of hormone-suppressed men trying to remember what it felt like to have a functioning endocrine system. I take magnesium for the cramps, fiber for the guts, calcium for the bones, and naps—frequent, unscheduled naps—for the fatigue.

But here’s the thing: I’m still here.

I’ve seen the needle move. Not fast enough. Not far enough. But enough to know that if the next ten years improve as much as the last fifteen, prostate cancer might finally lose its grip as the king of “you’ll probably die with it, not from it” apathy. We’ll be diagnosing it earlier, treating it smarter, and maybe—just maybe—preserving more of what makes us feel human in the process.

Fifteen Years From Now: My Wishlist, Should I Still Be Around (or Preserved in a Pickle Jar)

Now, let’s look ahead—because if I’ve learned anything, it’s that prostate cancer doesn’t quit. Here’s what I’d like to see in the next 15 years:

- A treatment that works without trashing testosterone. Imagine that, eradicating cancer cells without turning your body into a tepid, estrogen-soaked fog of hot flashes, belly fat, and mood swings. I’d like to fight cancer without also becoming a moody character

- Permanent remission that doesn’t mean permanent side effects. Let me keep my continence, my libido, and my brain. Or at least two out of three. Actually, no—just the brain. I can live without the other two if I can remember why.

- A diagnostic test better than PSA. PSA is useful but vague. It rises if your prostate sneezes. Give me a test that actually distinguishes between “harmless lump” and “you're screwed.” Something you can rely on before a biopsy turns your gland into Swiss cheese.

- Real prevention. Not “eat more broccoli” or “avoid bacon if you want to live.” I want vaccines. I want risk profiling by age 40. I want a world where men don’t find out they have prostate cancer from a random blood test in their 60s—they know before it ever takes root.

Psychological support that’s not a pamphlet. If you chemically castrate a man and irradiate his pelvis, maybe toss in more than a printout about yoga and breathing exercises. Some guys need therapy. Others need a support group. Some just need to scream into the void. Make room for all three.

- A cure. Yeah, I said it. Go big or go home. Not “managing,” not “slowing,” not “chronic condition.” I want them to use the C-word, and not the one that gets you kicked out of dinner parties.

So here’s to the next 15. I hope the men who follow us have it easier. I hope the doctors keep innovating. I hope the drug companies stop price gouging. And most of all, I hope that somewhere out there, a research team is building a future where prostate cancer isn’t a life sentence—or a 15-year science experiment on unwilling participants like me.

And if I’m still here in 2040, I’ll be the cranky old guy in the back of the support group, asking: “What took you so damn long?”

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@topf

I Ldo dragged my feet on the biopsy for a year. I thought a PSA flyctuating around 4 and a couple of time 3-ish did not warrant urgency. On top, the second opion in my MRI suggested pirads 2. Big mistake but hopefully not too consequential. Gleason was 4+4 in two cores and half of cores positive, mostly with 3+3.

You sound more like a veteran, so I thought you might have been in this longer.

Why did you choose RT over RPin the end? I am probBly doing RP, but I am only 52.

Jump to this post

I’ve had 3 PSA tests all downward trending but still elevated and a MRI PIRADS 3 with no focal lesions. I’ll do another PSA in 2 months and another MRI in 4 months. I hope this approach makes sense but in the back of my mind I feel like you in that I may be just dragging my feet on the biopsy.

REPLY

One of the best accounts I have read in a long time. Urologist continue to serve as the gatekeeper for men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Some are better at it than others. Treatment decisions are squarely on the shoulders of the patient. Patients are ill equipped to manage this challenge. Multidisciplinary and personalized treatment and/or surveillance plans should be incorporate into the NCCN prostate cancer guidelines treatment. This is not the responsibility of the patient.

REPLY
@proftom2

Knowledge Therapy. I am an old man adrift in a sea of advanced prostate cancer always in search of new advanced prostate cancer treatments/solutions. How old? I remember watching Sputnik cross the evening sky. In prostate cancer years my "watchful waiting phase" started back in the Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) days, pre-Netflix. There was a Blockbuster Video store Nextdoor to my primary care guy. That primary care guy informed me I had a prostate the size and texture of an 80 year old which concerned him because I was in my 40s. He introduced me to the term "Watchful Waiting." Bi-annual DRE's continued for decades. Eventually he retired from his practice turning it over to the young guy who introduced me to PSA exams instead of DRE's. My PSA's were always higher than the norms, around 4ish. The young guy wanted to act immediatley by send me for operations at the end of every office visit for years. Worried I was, always worried about cancer. I did what I always do when faced with life changing dilemmas and went searching for higher meaning. I call it "Knowledge Therapy." I went to a medical school for, not a second option, but consultive learning. I consulted with a prostate cancer specialist practitioner who is also a professor/scholar. She clearly understood my dilemma, pointed me in the right treatment direction and informed me it was time to think about quality of life. That consultation changed my life.
It prepared for my future. Knowing someday my PSA would spike, and it did, I knew how to handle it. She taught me about "Oncologist" and how to find the right one for my needs. Hint, easy going, with great communication skills, one that is mindful of aging processes and guide-full, not pushy. Took me about seven tries and I finally found him/her and she is wonderful. Every year I give myself the gift of "Knowledge Therapy" and attend annual advanced prostate cancer symposiums at different cancer reacher centers. For me they're always hopeful, educational, and great places to network with prostate cancer survivors.
I plan on attending the Prostate Cancer Institute symposiums this fall in CA. Last year I went to the prostate cancer institute in Seattle at Fred Hutch, wonderful.
When is the one at Mayo?

Jump to this post

😳 Still in your 40s, you deliberately waited for your cancer to become eventually metastatic to enjoy a higher quality of life until then? I think I have never heard that….

REPLY
@topf

😳 Still in your 40s, you deliberately waited for your cancer to become eventually metastatic to enjoy a higher quality of life until then? I think I have never heard that….

Jump to this post

Topf. In my 40s there was no "Deliberately Waiting," on my part. My treatment plan was "Watchful-Waiting" conducted by my primary care doctor and a cancer clinic. PSA, PET-scans, were not invented yet. Also, prostate cancer was considered a "Pre-Existing Condition" by my healthcare insurance. Back then prostate cancer was considered an old-guy cancer, guys in their 40s and 50s were aged-out, because they/me was not considered old. The affordable care put an end to "Pre-Existing Condition" denials.
"Never heard of "Quality of Life?" It's a standard of care scale for advanced cancer "Quality of Life" discussions used during advanced prostate cancer discussions during oncologist office visits.
Hope this helps. Best of luck in your prostate cancer journey.

REPLY
@johnw22

One of the best accounts I have read in a long time. Urologist continue to serve as the gatekeeper for men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Some are better at it than others. Treatment decisions are squarely on the shoulders of the patient. Patients are ill equipped to manage this challenge. Multidisciplinary and personalized treatment and/or surveillance plans should be incorporate into the NCCN prostate cancer guidelines treatment. This is not the responsibility of the patient.

Jump to this post

You get the patient to name the drug, and the doc is off the hook. Bailing on that kind of Doc. this wk. if the interview goes well. I have no business making that decision. No mor private urologist for me .

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.