Prostate Health Index (PHI) results: Time for a second opinion?
My husband recently had his first PSA test. It came back at 16.01. He was referred to an NP in urology. She did a DRE, which confirmed an enlarged prostate. She ordered additional PSA testing. The next day, his PHI showed 89.2, PSA total was down to 10.56, PSA free was 1.56, and %Free PSA was 14.8, p2PSA is 42.8
The NP sent a message in my chart stating that there is a 50 possibility of prostate cancer. He has an appointment for an MRI end of June. We are unavailable between May 27 and June 17, and no earlier MRI appointment is available. The NP made a video visit appointment for end of August to discuss MRI results and next steps.
After reading about the PHI tests, and my husband’s results, it seems like there is a greater likelihood of prostate cancer than 50%. My husband has CLL, and has had several secondary cancers. Numerous squamous cell carcinomas, and a malignant gist in his duodenum. Would it be prudent to get a second opinion with a urologist? We were not given the option of seeing a urologist at his first appointment. We know that prostate cancer is slow growing, but still want to speak with a urologist before end of June. Any recommendations?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
As @rider51 suggested, the PSE test is valuable and has a 94% plus accuracy rating and gives you results that either say you were likely to have prostate cancer or less likely to have prostate cancer. It works in conjunction with a PSA test but checks a number of bio markers.
Here is the list of available tests. Not sure if it stays this way, but I can’t see the image that I attached but it is there. Click in the blank spot on the left and the image pops up.
Thank you so much!
I hope everyone knows how helpful these recommendations, insights, and guidances are.
A lot of good people on this forum. Helping others in many ways.
Thank you! Thank you!
Thank you guys so much!!!
I started my prostate journey at Duke. There are some renowned experts there and they are a national center of excellence. But I also ran into waiting a long time for appointments and biopsies. I also found that questions weren't always answered and I was even told false information about a grading finding. I sought a second opinion at UNC down the road, also a center of excellence. Appointments were much faster, and they found a separate lesion that resulted in a higher Gleason grade. When I told them about what I was told about the grading system at Duke, two UNC doctors both joked out loud if Duke was making up their own grading system. Sure there's a heated basketball rivalry between these two, but you might seek a second opinion at UNC. Have everything sent over and you'll get called quickly - I was.