Gleason score 3+4 plus perineural invasion
Last year I had a 3+3 biopsy in one core but that was in a random core. This year the MRI found a new target lesion and they got four cores from the target. Results came back 3+4 (Gleason grade group 2) in all four cores with mostly 3. The report noted perineural invasion. No cribiform morphology was seen. The lesion abuts the edge of the prostate. My last PSA was 4.8 and it's been rising over the last few years. My dad has radical prostatectomy at age 58. My questions are...
1. What should I ask the doctor on follow up? Follow up tests like PSMA or genetics?
2. Has anyone had perineural invasion (nerve)? Does this mean it metastisized? How might that affect treatment decision?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
You speak with great authority here with definitive statements even making treatment recommendations. Are you a doctor? Is this in line with the guidelines of this forum?
Everything I can find in the research literature about PNI is mixed and I will wait to hear what my doctor says at follow up. I was hoping my post might elicit experiences from others who had similar pathology reports and what they did and what was recommended to them.
Sounds like you have some options and I hope your surgery in June goes well!
Hey bud, I too had extensive PI - figured I was a goner.
But my RO at Sloan actually co-authored a study on PI and the conclusion, very roughly expressed, was that it was a measure of how far laterally (and extensive) the cells have spread and NOT a measure of aggression.
Of course, lateral expansion implies capsular encroachment so that’s not a good thing either.
My surgical path showed a tiny break in the capsule, but margins and lymph were negative. Still, I just finished SRT so take every finding with a boulder of salt.
Phil
I quoted doctors in what I have said to you. I have recommended things that are standards of care with prostate cancer. When I give advice I almost always include, ask your doctor, unless the recommendations are for slight differences like Orgovyx over the other ADT options.
I have attended Advance prostate cancer weekly meetings at Ancan.org for about 4 years. During the meetings, they recommend treatments to people that are most likely to be standard of care. I also attend biweekly meetings with another group and monthly meetings with UCSF’s group. All of these meetings discussed treatments for people that have a need for options because many of the times the doctors they are going to are not following guidelines and under treating people. When I recommend different treatments, I almost always say ask your doctor, since I am not a doctor.
People need to have exposure to different treatments that other people are having that actually work. That’s one of the reasons they come in here, To get other options For their treatments.
I also have had quite a bit of experience with prostate cancer. I’ve had surgery and both salvage and SBRT radiation. I’ve had four reoccurrences, and with all I’ve learned during the 15 years I’ve had prostate cancer I can pass on a lot of first hand experience.
Thanks for sharing. I realize that nerve invasion does not necessarily equal metastasis but it means the cancer cells are not necessarily bundled in a tight lesion but connecting to other cell types. Lots of nerves in the prostate as those of us who've gotten biopsies can attest so they are prime targets for the cancer cells. I read one study that discussed the biochemistry behind nerve invasion.
So glad your margins and lymph nodes were clear! May you stay cancer free.
You've been through a lot with the recurrences and multiple treatments and hope you stay cancer free.
Your self education, awareness and advocacy is appreciated. The info you shared is interesting but in my opinion your tone came off as a bit superior and final in the face of competing literature. But it's sometimes difficult to gauge such things on an asynchronous forum.
Take care and keep up the cancer battle.