Newly diagnosed with prostate cancer and still gathering information

I don’t think so. I can’t recall all the studies but RP seems to have uncomfortably short times before recurrence. Because of the risk of undetected cancer, they tend to radiate around the lymph and pelvic areas. But, if you are going to do that, why not just do radiation. That way you don’t have the prostate removal to deal with. With what I have been researching, all the indications seem to be, we have been over-treating. My current guy has the same philosophy as I do…don’t treat if you can’t see.
I’m 73 btw. As a further thought, less applicable to me, but more for you is: the technology and mindset is changing quickly. There will be better technology latter on if you need it. But some of the RT I’ve seen have incredibly long cancer-free results.

Jeff,
Yeah, my father lived to 93, almost 94. As far as I know, I’m the only one stuck with PC. I’m not going to make it that far. That I can tell you.
My brother is 76. His PSA is 0.6. Never goes up. So, there’s that.
I did the surgery. Initially there are some side effects but they go away after a few months. Radiation gets worse.
My friend had surgery, external beam, then adjuvant brachytherapy a few months later. I asked him how things are going. He said my stuff doesn’t work. Then I asked him how is girlfriend felt about that. He said, she sticks around as long as I pay the bills.
This is why I chose surgery. If it comes back, there’s plan B, radiation. I guess you could call it Plan R (Dr. Strange love.)
Lou

I thought that 0.2 PSA is when they start to get a bit concerned. But then they monitor it to see what direction and the doubling time. Once on Orgovyx, keep researching. You’ll be surprised at the options you have. It is worth it to put in the time. Forget the PSA, look for a treatment that you are satisfied with. For me, surgery could never be that.

I would just like to add that type of aggressiveness of PC can effect treatment choice.

My husband had one core with intraductal and cribriform present and even though his gleason score is 4+3 he should be treated as high risk case.
Some studies show that patients with intraductal cancer have better survival with initial RP regardless if later RT is needed or not. Also, I read on couple of other forums about cases where RT did not kill cribriform cells in prostate even with high precision radiation. Those cases could be aberrations but it is hard to know since only about 2% of PC have intraductal component. BUT, to be on a safe side, we will probably opt for RP - I say probably since we still did not have a chance to talk to any specialist and are still waiting for PSMA results so we do not even know if cancer left prostate or not.

I am just writing this as info. for new patients who are trying to decide between RP or RT to know that in some cases RP has advantage over radiation.

@robertov, thanks but it’s a little late for me. I already had surgery at age 64 - Gleason 4+3 Unfavorable. Very High volume.
When PSA climbs after surgery it’s watched carefully and when it accelerates it’s time to act. 5 yrs in my case.
Some docs start at levels lower than 0.2, others a but higher in the hope PSMA might show something (usually doesn’t).
At age 73 your preference for radiation is certainly understandable - I might have opted for it myself but I was too “young” and the chance for recurrence was high. I wanted more than one chance to hit back and I got it. After that, who knows?
Phil

I'm 67, diagnosed in July. Gleason originally was 4+3. I had the surgery in November, and they determined my Gleason was 4+5 with some spread to the bladder neck. My first PSA is undetectable but I'm still working on incontinence. I'm happy I did the surgery because my cancer was more aggressive than the biopsy showed. Doctor said it "could have been fatal." Recurrence seems likely in my case,

@robertov, thanks but it’s a little late for me. I already had surgery at age 64 - Gleason 4+3 Unfavorable. Very High volume.
When PSA climbs after surgery it’s watched carefully and when it accelerates it’s time to act. 5 yrs in my case.
Some docs start at levels lower than 0.2, others a but higher in the hope PSMA might show something (usually doesn’t).
At age 73 your preference for radiation is certainly understandable - I might have opted for it myself but I was too “young” and the chance for recurrence was high. I wanted more than one chance to hit back and I got it. After that, who knows?
Phil