← Return to A guided tour to the real conundrum of treatment choices

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@packman7

Well put Hans , but sadly so true !
With today’s technologies there ought to be an accurate method to identify the best treatment given individual cancer .
I see on this site so many people with low PSAs and high Gleasons , mine is opposite a PSA of 16 and a Gleasin 3+3 but 8/12 cores positive so you are led to believe you have the lowest aggressiveness of cancer but definitely a higher volume of cancer , so what do you do ??

Jump to this post


Replies to "Well put Hans , but sadly so true ! With today’s technologies there ought to be..."

Even with a low Gleason score, having a high number of positive cores and an elevated PSA puts you in a gray zone where “low risk” doesn’t feel so low. While the numbers suggest a less aggressive cancer, the sheer volume raises red flags that deserve a closer look. This is where second opinions, imaging, and possibly genomic testing can help cut through the uncertainty. You're not just a set of stats — you're the one who has to live with the decision, so make sure it's built on as much clarity as science (and a little gut instinct) can give.