← Return to Choosing Active Surveillance over any further treatment at this time

Discussion

Choosing Active Surveillance over any further treatment at this time

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Apr 3 10:52am | Replies (52)
Comment receiving replies
@jsh327

I can undertstand the reluctance to for an invasive procedure. If you later decide to get a PSE test and have any problem such as this with the provider, my understanding is that the PSE test manufacturer can help you. The manufacturer contact name was provided in this forum before and I found him to be very responsive via email.

Jump to this post

Replies to "I can undertstand the reluctance to for an invasive procedure. If you later decide to get..."
johnj314 | @johnj314 | Apr 3 4:33am

Hi, I’ve been a Mayo patient of Dr. Tollefson for five years and am on active surveillance. Lady year my second biopsy had one core advance to 3+4 although it was < 10% of the sample. We sent to Veracyte for the Decipher test and it too was a .22. I will continue on active surveillance as long as I can. When I do treat it I’m leaning toward the Tulsa procedure. Any comments or suggestions from anyone?

VIEW AND REPLY