Treatment Decision - Radical Prostatectomy versus Radiation Therapy

Posted by dougharris @dougharris, Oct 6, 2024

Recently diagnosed and now stuck in that frustrating "no man's land" between surgery and radiation therapy. Diagnosed after an increase in my PSA to 5.2 and concerns about family history of disease (father). Particulars are as follow: MRI showed 2 lesions, PI-RADS 5, with no evidence of seminal or lymph node involvement. Follow-up perneaural biopsy showed Gleason - 3+4 from biopsy; Biopsy showed positive in 9 out of 22 cores with perineural invasion present in one biopsy sample. Surgeon indicated that I was not a candidate for AS and recommended surgery (robotic). The surgery, however, would be somewhat challenging due to the location of one of the tumors near the apex of the prostate and based upon this he gave me a clinical staging of cT3a. This would require a wide dissection to maximize the probability of negative margins which might have a negative impact on the ureal sphincter. The imaging was inconclusive for extraprostatic extension, but suggest there might be local extension. Surgery would probably include a partial nerve dissection with nerve sparing on one side.

Due to these complications, the surgeon suggested that I also consult with a radiation oncologist. Radiation oncologist confirmed the diagnosis and also felt that the EPE would be rated at 1 - 2. No surprise, the oncologist recommended radiotherapy over surgery. This would be IMRT or SBRT with or without ADT (informed by Decipher test results). A sample of my biopsy tissue was sent out for a Decipher test to assess the genetic aggressiveness of the cancer. This would also inform my eligibility to participate in a clinical trial relating to RT with or without ADT.

So there I am...learned much more about PC than I ever thought I would have to. My doctors are at Mayo Clinic - Phoenix and they really seem to know their stuff. I am a retired Engineer with a background in statistics so I have reviewed at least 15 study results at this time. The survivability is relatively easy to quantify. The difficult part is the quality of life impact. I am 66, in good health (I cycle more than 100 miles/week) so discussions that sort of put an "end date" to your survivability are a bit unnerving. The difficult part of this process is the "joint decision making" with your providers when you are stuck in the middle between two choices with very similar statistical outcomes, but potential divergent and uncertain QOL impacts.

My initial thought going into this was that surgery would be my path. The idea of removing the "source" was appealing. The challenges with my specific presentation, however, gave me second thoughts and after exploring the RT options, I began to rethink the surgery approach. I am stuck in that state and looking for any insight that might help me move forward...

Thanks!!!!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@mlabus3

I am close to the same boat as Doug - a classic "tweener". 70, good health, 5 psa, 3+5 Gleason, possible Interductal in biopsy. 6 of 12 cores positive. Would probably be low risk except my Decipher puts me at high risk. Havent found a surgeon or radiologist that wants to discuss pros and cons of each. ie start ADT now regardless, possible surgery + radiation. My family is all over me to make a decision! not sure where the Decipher score puts me in terms of best solution.

Like another post, i was originally all in for surgery, but now on the fence. A couple studies seem to show radiation better at "distant metastis". Should probably start ADT regardless, as months have ticked off as i try to figure out best course. Disapointed that Hopkins doesnt have the MRI guided radiation. More disaponted at lack of internal coordination at top shelf cancer programs. (hopkins, georgetown). any advice appreciated.

Jump to this post

I was worried about that Gleason, but 3+4 is a good start to work from for a remission. Six of 12 cores with a 3+4 would not be favorable. Intraductal usually comes with cribriform which is very aggressive. It would really helped for you to know exactly what was found.

Can you get your slides reviewed by someone else and find out whether intraductal is actually there. There is a Doctor who is an expert at doing this, Charges $450 but you will know for sure what’s going on. Dr. Jonathan Epstein in New York is the GOAT when it comes to PC.
https://advanceduropathology.com/consultation/
There are other places you can go to get a second opinion.

REPLY

Thanks! Will check it out. My original biopsy was done at Hopkins, so free pretty good they are accurate. But I can risk $450 to get a second opinion.

Are decipher scores pretty bullet-proof? Was shocked at how high my was (93%). Was thinking about doing another one using a different firm (cant remember the names).

REPLY
@mlabus3

Sorry, make that 3+4 Gleason......

Jump to this post

That correction was important to your diagnosis. My Decipher went the other way. I was intermediate (3+4=7) downgraded to low risk. So did not need hormone treatments.

The hormone treatments do not kill prostate cancer (from my R/Os). The stunt it. The prostate cells love testorone and by starving them of it they don't grow as much as they would without it. Some get greater stunt of the growth than others.

Most of all prostate cancers are slow growing. It is why it has such a high cure rate for 5 years. But some forms are very aggressive and if it has spread outside of prostate that is another level of cancer.

Have you considered traveling to a center that has the equipment and facilities you want. Many places have programs for those coming from out if state and will assist with lodging, etc.

I drove an hour instead of 25 minutes 5 days a week to get proton radiation at UFHPTI. For me the extra time was worth it if I could lesson the probability of radiation damage that proton radiation offered above photon.

REPLY

I live near the Johns Hopkins Proton Center, so I think I am ok there. Thanks. Assuming I go radiation route. Still considering surgery. Not sure which is better for my more aggressive cancer.

REPLY
@mlabus3

I live near the Johns Hopkins Proton Center, so I think I am ok there. Thanks. Assuming I go radiation route. Still considering surgery. Not sure which is better for my more aggressive cancer.

Jump to this post

As an engineer you must be good with numbers. Age 66 is considered “young” these days and if you are in otherwise good health, even younger.
As others have suggested, you really need to pin down those biopsy pathology results, because if they come back with cribriform (intraductal being more aggressive), coupled with your very high Decipher score, you have a type of cancer that statistically has a greater chance of recurring after treatment (any treatment).
That doesn’t mean it WILL, but it could.
With that in mind, perhaps surgery might be the better option. Once the gland is removed, the pathologist will view it as a whole, EPE will be absolutely known as well as any breaks in the capsule, lymph node involvement, etc.
Hopefully, all will be negative. But if not you will then know if you should go on ADT and receive radiation or perhaps monitor your PSA’s on a 3 month basis. Any recurrence down the road (even many years later) can be treated with radiation.
I know Proton therapy is supposed to be kinder to surrounding tissues due to the Bragg Effect, so not sure if salvage surgery is more successful in these cases or not.
One other thing I would add: get a second surgical opinion. Your current surgeon sounds very honest and forthcoming (a lot are not) but the way you present it, it almost seems like he doesn’t want to do the surgery for whatever reason. Not sure if it’s a lack of experience in a complicated case, but you want to find the VERY BEST if they are gonna be cutting down there! Best,
Phil

REPLY
@mlabus3

I live near the Johns Hopkins Proton Center, so I think I am ok there. Thanks. Assuming I go radiation route. Still considering surgery. Not sure which is better for my more aggressive cancer.

Jump to this post

My urologist at Sibley Hopkins gave me the biopsy report of intermediate unfavorable and subsequent Decipher was 78 high risk. I'm older at 78 but he was strongly recommending radiation over surgery. So I did Proton Therapy at Hopkins which I completed a month ago. I also met several men there with prior RP who were there for salvage radiation. Happy with my decision but underscore that it's yours alone to make in consultation with your treatment team rather than any recommendations you might get in this thread or others about which is the better option. Good luck!

REPLY
@brian5837

My urologist at Sibley Hopkins gave me the biopsy report of intermediate unfavorable and subsequent Decipher was 78 high risk. I'm older at 78 but he was strongly recommending radiation over surgery. So I did Proton Therapy at Hopkins which I completed a month ago. I also met several men there with prior RP who were there for salvage radiation. Happy with my decision but underscore that it's yours alone to make in consultation with your treatment team rather than any recommendations you might get in this thread or others about which is the better option. Good luck!

Jump to this post

if you don't mind me asking, who was your urologist and who was your radiation oncologist ?

REPLY

I had High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in 2018. HIFU. All clear seven years later.

REPLY
@mlabus3

if you don't mind me asking, who was your urologist and who was your radiation oncologist ?

Jump to this post

If you can private message me, I will give you those names that way and since we both seem to live in the area, will also offer to make myself available to talk if you'd like.

REPLY
@brian5837

My urologist at Sibley Hopkins gave me the biopsy report of intermediate unfavorable and subsequent Decipher was 78 high risk. I'm older at 78 but he was strongly recommending radiation over surgery. So I did Proton Therapy at Hopkins which I completed a month ago. I also met several men there with prior RP who were there for salvage radiation. Happy with my decision but underscore that it's yours alone to make in consultation with your treatment team rather than any recommendations you might get in this thread or others about which is the better option. Good luck!

Jump to this post

@brian5837
Echo your statement about has to be your decision alone.
Using your medical providers and consultations to guide you as this is a medical decision and should come from medical prosfessionals.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.