← Return to Nanoknee, is it better or merely hype?
DiscussionNanoknee, is it better or merely hype?
Joint Replacements | Last Active: Feb 4 6:17pm | Replies (92)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "I had LTKR (left knee replaced) using nanoknee (Arroyo Grande, CA/USA) Nov, 2024, then had Mako..."
@imaginger are you able to get on your knees and if you do for how long
@imaginger how is it now?
@imaginger was paying the 8500 causing the regret? Sounds less painful?
Nano and Jiffy are marketing gambits. They focus on the initial cut but there is far more to a knee replacement than how one enters the leg. There is the choice of implant materials (are you allergic to metals?), implant brand, implant type (a BCR requires a different type of implant than a posterior stabilized implant which removes both the PCL and the ACL), the use of a tourniquet, the type of alignment, etc.
Nano and Jiffy are a good starting point. But look for someone doing a similar method (subvastus or midvastus) with lots and lots of successful experience.
@imaginger
Hi,
I am considering nano surgery.
Would you recommend it over regular TKR ?
Do you think it is worth the $8500 cost to reduce the recovery time and pain?
In your experience is the recovery that mucj quicker?
Thanks
,Jay
Connect

So what I get from your experience is that Nanoknee was better than Mako? A friend who had traditional titanium TKR had a longer recovery and more pain than either of those from what I've heard from him.