Stage 1 lobular breast cancer, anyone no treatment after surgery?
I am one week out on my lumpectomy and according to recent statistics, have a 5 to 7% chance of recurrence in the next five years with this type of cancer without treatment. I cannot imagine putting my body through all the side effects of radiation and AI treatment when I have a 95% chance of nothing happening. Apparently with this cancer the risk is late recurrence, after 10 years. I am so torn and stressed out by the decision I have to make. They asked me to make it in the next two weeks. Am I the only one who has considered not taking any other treatment after surgery because I honestly believe there will be big advancements in that period of time?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.
Thank you so much for this response. I was starting to think I was the Lone Ranger out there after looking at the odds, and feeling the way I was feeling. It certainly makes sense to me and good luck!
I did have radiation and am mad I did. My radiation oncologist recommended 5 treatment of rad. At a high level but said my heart would be fine. So I got it done. Then when I went to cardiologist he was so rude and just said oh yeah, you will get corotid arteries from radiation (left side) I was like…don’t you guys talk to each other? For Gods sake.
Why would rad oncologist act like the heart would he fine when it won’t? I prayed when I got my radiation for God to protect my heart. So there is that!!! 🙏💕💪🏻✅
Yes, they were pushing the brachytherapy for me. My late Dad had radiation for colon cancer and it made the last year of his life hell. So I may have some PTSD about radiation. I do hope nothing bad did happen with your heart and sending prayers for your good health!
What I have found in my treatment is everything is so siloed. Each area has it's own narrow part in treatment.
My surgeon is not doing any Oncotype DX or gene testing. I'm stage one and 69.
I have DCIS with invasive cells, stage 1a, grade 2-3 (not lobular BC). Even before surgery, the surgeon said that she didn't do Oncotype for people over 70. I'm 80. After 2 surgeries, medical oncologist said I could have Oncotype done but would have to wait a month to get the results. I could not start radiation until Oncotype results were received. By this time more than 3 months had passed since the cancer was first discovered. So I decided not to pursue Oncotype testing, assuming that because I was 80, my cancer was probably not very aggressive. After radiation, I started aromatase inhibitors but tolerated them poorly.
I went to a 2nd medical oncologist (at a different cancer center), asked her for Oncotype test and she ordered it. My hope was that my score would be low and that it would be safe for me not to take aromatase inhibitors. Instead, my score was 29 (higher than I'd hoped for!). So, in addition to anastrozole, I am just now starting Kisqali (ribociclib). My conclusion: older people can and do have (relatively) aggressive cancers and should have Oncotype (or other genetic tests for their tumors). Age should not be the deciding factor.
If you use Medicare they require the hospital to hold the sample for two weeks and then wait another two weeks for results. We need to call our people in office and have this changed.