← Return to Ignoring Prostate Cancer Entirely

Discussion

Ignoring Prostate Cancer Entirely

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 2 hours ago | Replies (32)

Comment receiving replies
@cianci

I have read the british study too and was leaning toward AS with my 3+4 gleason, 12psa at age 78. But my tumor was at the edge of the prostate and the study says although 15 year mortality is similar, 76% of the AS group needed treatment during that 15 year period.
It's a very tough call, playing odds, and very personal decision.
I will start proton radiation and hope for the best. My friend did this 2 years ago and when i ask him how the side effects are, he says 'what side effects'. I hope we are all so lucky.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I have read the british study too and was leaning toward AS with my 3+4 gleason,..."

Just one person's perspective: when you're in a fight for your life, side-effects like bladder or rectal irritation (radiation cystitis or proctitis) don't seem like a big deal.

I'd prefer to have avoided the discomfort and embarrassment, of course, but they'd never have influenced my treatment decisions an iota.

But, to be fair, I was young and I knew my cancer was serious. The challenge is when the findings are inconclusive (e.g. Gleason score 6, PSA < 10) and/or you're very elderly.