Switching from Lupron to Orgovyx.

Posted by chippydoo @chippydoo, Feb 28 9:16am

Doing 6 months ADT and considering switching from Lupron to Orgovyx for my second 3-month period. Have any of you done this? If so, I would be interested in hearing about your experience.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Thanks Kevin. I will look into those trials as I am not familiar with ARI. Only blood my urology practice will do is T and PSA with no other monitoring. Stated zero concerns until after first year on ADT. I see my PCP the day after SO next month and going to have a talk with her to see if she is up to the task. Finishing radiation today and thankful for being over that grind. I do lift, run some and mountain bike which are positives. Found an interesting article in Urology Times on ARI and AE's. Managing AEs for ARI Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer

REPLY
@kujhawk1978

The Lupron shot you've had will take some time after its advertised shelf life to clear your system.

I personally don't see any issue in switching, what does your medical team say?

As to mono-therapy with an ARI, yes, that is a possible option. Supporting data for that comes out of the EMBARK trial so discuss that with your medical team.

I'm off treatment now. When, not if, I go back treatment I intend to have that discussion with my oncologist. It should be interesting as he swears we'll do 24 months ADT + ARI and SBRT (the EMBARK trial has as an arm the 24 month ADT+ARI).

I also will discuss the PATCH trial which uses an trans-dermal estrogen patch vice ADT.

As to being on bone strengthening agents while on ADT, yes and no. My general understanding is one should have a baseline bone density scan. For those on longer term ADT, possibly, short term, less so. There is also resistance training which can be a factor in mitigating the bone density impacts of longer term ADT.

Kevin

Jump to this post

Hi Kevin, I’ve read a bit about the PATCH trial and it seems like a real game changer for testosterone suppression without most of the nasty side effects associated with the usual ADT agents.
But they do emphasize that this trial is for non-metastatic cases. If I am reading your graphs correctly, it seems that you had some metastasis to lymph nodes; can you still use the trans-dermal patch?? And if not, why not? They neglect to mention that! Thanks for all your input snd info on this board.
Phil

REPLY

Phil

From the trial protocol...http://patch.mrcctu.ucl.ac.uk/media/1310/patch-protocol_v150_may_clean_signed-2024_.pdf

In order to be considered eligible for enrolment in this trial, patients should fulfil one of the
criteria in the first section.

Additionally, all patients must fulfil all of the criteria in the second section and none of the exclusion criteria.

Newly Diagnosed Patients
…with one of:-
(i) Stage T3/4 NO or NX M0 histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma with
either PSA≥20ng/ml or Gleason sum score ≥6
(ii) Stage Tany N+ M0 or Tany Nany M+ histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
(iii) Multiple sclerotic bone metastases with a PSA≥50ng/ml without histological
confirmation of prostate cancer
OR
Patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
previously treated with radical surgery and/or radiotherapy who are now relapsing …with at least one of:-
(i) PSA ≥4ng/ml and rising with doubling time less than 6 months
(ii) PSA ≥20ng/ml
(iii) Documented evidence of metastatic disease with PSA>4ng/ml

For all patients
(i) Intention to treat with continuous long-term ADT (> 3 year
(ii) Fit for all protocol treatment and follow-up, WHO performance status 0-2 (see Appendix A)
(iii) Should have completed the appropriate investigations prior to randomisation (see Section 4.4)
(iv) Written informed consent
(v) Willing and expected to comply with protocol
(vi) For newly diagnosed N0M0 patients only – Intention to treat with radical radiotherapy (unless there is a specific contraindication; exemption can be sought in advance of consent after discussion with the PATCH Trial Manager).

Note: Prior hormone therapy for localised disease must have been completed at least 12 months previously and
have been no longer than 12 months in duration. It can have been given as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy..

Kevin

REPLY
@kujhawk1978

Phil

From the trial protocol...http://patch.mrcctu.ucl.ac.uk/media/1310/patch-protocol_v150_may_clean_signed-2024_.pdf

In order to be considered eligible for enrolment in this trial, patients should fulfil one of the
criteria in the first section.

Additionally, all patients must fulfil all of the criteria in the second section and none of the exclusion criteria.

Newly Diagnosed Patients
…with one of:-
(i) Stage T3/4 NO or NX M0 histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma with
either PSA≥20ng/ml or Gleason sum score ≥6
(ii) Stage Tany N+ M0 or Tany Nany M+ histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
(iii) Multiple sclerotic bone metastases with a PSA≥50ng/ml without histological
confirmation of prostate cancer
OR
Patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
previously treated with radical surgery and/or radiotherapy who are now relapsing …with at least one of:-
(i) PSA ≥4ng/ml and rising with doubling time less than 6 months
(ii) PSA ≥20ng/ml
(iii) Documented evidence of metastatic disease with PSA>4ng/ml

For all patients
(i) Intention to treat with continuous long-term ADT (> 3 year
(ii) Fit for all protocol treatment and follow-up, WHO performance status 0-2 (see Appendix A)
(iii) Should have completed the appropriate investigations prior to randomisation (see Section 4.4)
(iv) Written informed consent
(v) Willing and expected to comply with protocol
(vi) For newly diagnosed N0M0 patients only – Intention to treat with radical radiotherapy (unless there is a specific contraindication; exemption can be sought in advance of consent after discussion with the PATCH Trial Manager).

Note: Prior hormone therapy for localised disease must have been completed at least 12 months previously and
have been no longer than 12 months in duration. It can have been given as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy..

Kevin

Jump to this post

The patch trial was completed. I’ve already seen a descriptive report of the results in PCa Commentary volume 195 November 2024. The final report Is supposed to be released at the next UK conference. An estradiol patch is just as successful as ADT in suppressing testosterone, but had some positive results. It did reduce brain fog.

If you have BRCA2 it cannot be used, estrogen can cause breast cancer.

Here are some of the results

At 3 years metastasis-free survival was the same for both agents ~86 to 87%. Overall survival
was similar over 14 years of follow-up.
- The adverse effects profile favored tE2, reducing hot flushes from 89% (Lupron) to 44% (tE2).
At 2 years bone mineral density improved by 7.9% ( tE2) vs. a -3% worsening for Lupron. This
change occurred rapidly over the first year. tE2 provided an improved quality of life.
- Cardiovascular adverse effects (heart failure, angina and myocardial infarction and
thromboembolic strokes) were similar, about 7-10% . However, gynecomastia developed in
85% (tE2) vs. 44% (Lupron). Prophylactic low-dose radiation to breast tissue lessens this
development.
- Dr. Langley concluded: “Transdermal estrogen provides choice about expected side effects
and route of administration allowing personalized treatment plans. Transdermal estradiol
should be a standard-of-care ADT option in M0 disease.”

Richard Wassersug PhD, Who wrote the book Androgen Deprivation Therapy has been on estradiol patches and Now estradiol gel for a couple years. He’s given talks over at Ancan.org On the use of the estradiol patch. Here’s the link to one of the webinars
https://ancan.org/talking-estradiol-e2-for-recurrent-and-advanced-prostate-cancer/

REPLY
@jeffmarc

The patch trial was completed. I’ve already seen a descriptive report of the results in PCa Commentary volume 195 November 2024. The final report Is supposed to be released at the next UK conference. An estradiol patch is just as successful as ADT in suppressing testosterone, but had some positive results. It did reduce brain fog.

If you have BRCA2 it cannot be used, estrogen can cause breast cancer.

Here are some of the results

At 3 years metastasis-free survival was the same for both agents ~86 to 87%. Overall survival
was similar over 14 years of follow-up.
- The adverse effects profile favored tE2, reducing hot flushes from 89% (Lupron) to 44% (tE2).
At 2 years bone mineral density improved by 7.9% ( tE2) vs. a -3% worsening for Lupron. This
change occurred rapidly over the first year. tE2 provided an improved quality of life.
- Cardiovascular adverse effects (heart failure, angina and myocardial infarction and
thromboembolic strokes) were similar, about 7-10% . However, gynecomastia developed in
85% (tE2) vs. 44% (Lupron). Prophylactic low-dose radiation to breast tissue lessens this
development.
- Dr. Langley concluded: “Transdermal estrogen provides choice about expected side effects
and route of administration allowing personalized treatment plans. Transdermal estradiol
should be a standard-of-care ADT option in M0 disease.”

Richard Wassersug PhD, Who wrote the book Androgen Deprivation Therapy has been on estradiol patches and Now estradiol gel for a couple years. He’s given talks over at Ancan.org On the use of the estradiol patch. Here’s the link to one of the webinars
https://ancan.org/talking-estradiol-e2-for-recurrent-and-advanced-prostate-cancer/

Jump to this post

Thanx, had seen the results somewhere, had a senior moment.

I had genomic testing done, no issues there.

From what you posted and what I have read, a viable option to discuss with my medical team when the time comes.

Given the look my radiologist and oncologist gave me when I mentioned it, should be a lively discussion!

REPLY
@kujhawk1978

Phil

From the trial protocol...http://patch.mrcctu.ucl.ac.uk/media/1310/patch-protocol_v150_may_clean_signed-2024_.pdf

In order to be considered eligible for enrolment in this trial, patients should fulfil one of the
criteria in the first section.

Additionally, all patients must fulfil all of the criteria in the second section and none of the exclusion criteria.

Newly Diagnosed Patients
…with one of:-
(i) Stage T3/4 NO or NX M0 histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma with
either PSA≥20ng/ml or Gleason sum score ≥6
(ii) Stage Tany N+ M0 or Tany Nany M+ histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
(iii) Multiple sclerotic bone metastases with a PSA≥50ng/ml without histological
confirmation of prostate cancer
OR
Patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
previously treated with radical surgery and/or radiotherapy who are now relapsing …with at least one of:-
(i) PSA ≥4ng/ml and rising with doubling time less than 6 months
(ii) PSA ≥20ng/ml
(iii) Documented evidence of metastatic disease with PSA>4ng/ml

For all patients
(i) Intention to treat with continuous long-term ADT (> 3 year
(ii) Fit for all protocol treatment and follow-up, WHO performance status 0-2 (see Appendix A)
(iii) Should have completed the appropriate investigations prior to randomisation (see Section 4.4)
(iv) Written informed consent
(v) Willing and expected to comply with protocol
(vi) For newly diagnosed N0M0 patients only – Intention to treat with radical radiotherapy (unless there is a specific contraindication; exemption can be sought in advance of consent after discussion with the PATCH Trial Manager).

Note: Prior hormone therapy for localised disease must have been completed at least 12 months previously and
have been no longer than 12 months in duration. It can have been given as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy..

Kevin

Jump to this post

Thanks, Kevin - great info!

REPLY
@jeffmarc

The patch trial was completed. I’ve already seen a descriptive report of the results in PCa Commentary volume 195 November 2024. The final report Is supposed to be released at the next UK conference. An estradiol patch is just as successful as ADT in suppressing testosterone, but had some positive results. It did reduce brain fog.

If you have BRCA2 it cannot be used, estrogen can cause breast cancer.

Here are some of the results

At 3 years metastasis-free survival was the same for both agents ~86 to 87%. Overall survival
was similar over 14 years of follow-up.
- The adverse effects profile favored tE2, reducing hot flushes from 89% (Lupron) to 44% (tE2).
At 2 years bone mineral density improved by 7.9% ( tE2) vs. a -3% worsening for Lupron. This
change occurred rapidly over the first year. tE2 provided an improved quality of life.
- Cardiovascular adverse effects (heart failure, angina and myocardial infarction and
thromboembolic strokes) were similar, about 7-10% . However, gynecomastia developed in
85% (tE2) vs. 44% (Lupron). Prophylactic low-dose radiation to breast tissue lessens this
development.
- Dr. Langley concluded: “Transdermal estrogen provides choice about expected side effects
and route of administration allowing personalized treatment plans. Transdermal estradiol
should be a standard-of-care ADT option in M0 disease.”

Richard Wassersug PhD, Who wrote the book Androgen Deprivation Therapy has been on estradiol patches and Now estradiol gel for a couple years. He’s given talks over at Ancan.org On the use of the estradiol patch. Here’s the link to one of the webinars
https://ancan.org/talking-estradiol-e2-for-recurrent-and-advanced-prostate-cancer/

Jump to this post

Great info, jeffmarc; I asked about the PATCH trial because my friend has non alcoholic liver cirrhosis but needs ADT. His drs are concerned that Orgovyx could really damage his liver further.
However, the estradiol in the patch is absorbed initially thru the skin and doesn’t do what is called a “first pass” through the liver, thus sparing the enzyme flares that are so common.
And Kevin, I am sure his RO is gonna also give him “the look” when he mentions it!😳

REPLY
@heavyphil

Great info, jeffmarc; I asked about the PATCH trial because my friend has non alcoholic liver cirrhosis but needs ADT. His drs are concerned that Orgovyx could really damage his liver further.
However, the estradiol in the patch is absorbed initially thru the skin and doesn’t do what is called a “first pass” through the liver, thus sparing the enzyme flares that are so common.
And Kevin, I am sure his RO is gonna also give him “the look” when he mentions it!😳

Jump to this post

Haha If you go to an RO enough you will end up with radiation. An SO, more than likely surgery. Ortho Surgeon, Knee Surgery as he stated.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.