elimination of testosterone through ADT and aggressive behavior
I wanted to solicit your thoughts on something that has been on my mind regarding my treatment. I started Firmagon 2months ago, PSA went from 26.7 to6.7. Had Brachytherapy last Tuesday, EBRT to follow. Don't know current PSA levels - I assume they'd be lower.
Given that my prostate cancer developed in a naturally low-testosterone environment, I was wondering whether complete androgen deprivation through ADT could push the tumor to become more aggressive in its attempt to survive. Specifically, could eliminating testosterone encourage the cancer to adapt by finding alternative growth pathways, such as increasing androgen receptor sensitivity or relying on other metabolic sources?
I ask because, after two Firmagon injections, my PSA has only dropped to 6.7, which seems slower than expected. Could this be related to the tumor already being adapted to a low-testosterone state, or is it within a reasonable range at this stage of treatment? Would this have any implications for how we monitor PSA trends or consider additional therapies down the line?
I appreciate your time and any insights you can share. Looking forward to our next appointment.
Thank you again, as always, for the audience's advice and wisdom. Patience is not a strong point for me.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
My God, I never thought I would meet someone with a more pessimistic view than me!! Must admit, you see the glass even emptier than I do….😳
The “0ther 25%” is getting a nasty dose of radiation, some of which you’ve already gotten. ADT was never going to bring your PSA down to zero, or even close. You have a tumor, remember?? Let the radiation do its thing before you start imagining the next steps, OK?
We could discuss where the “pessimist” and “realist” lines are.
Sure….You go first…
Of course.. a pessimist sees the diagnosis as a death sentence; a realist sees it as a challenge with odds, strategies, and room for maneuvering. I am not at all concerned about the positives. I want to understand the odds and timely approaches to those elements that will play a role in the future if they’re not addressed today or soon. That, I think, does not make me a pessimist. Your thinking is exactly why companies and governments fail in risk management: the obvious isn’t going to be an issue, it’s the non-obvious that’s going to (as is so clearly stated in American English) - bite your ass.
OR…..the non obvious possibility that you die from a heart attack or stroke? Or a jealous husband coming home from work early? Choking to death on a healthy carrot stick? The possibilities are endless….
My ability to manage risk as far as cancer is concerned is almost nil at this point. I’ve GOT it. All the organic food, supplements and exercise - while good in general - were not good enough in particular to avoid this disease. So now I treat it, one logical step at a time.
So if you feel that you are managing risk by conjuring up scenarios - and hypothetical solutions - which will probably never happen in the real world, you are going to be anxious, frustrated and exhausted.
Take it easy until you know more…
Phil