← Return to Is anyone else afraid to start taking Forteo?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@broken13

Hi Mayblin. Spine T-Score before Forteo was -4.1 and Femoral neck -2.8. They could not read the lumbar spine after Forteo due to the previous fractures. Femoral neck improved -2.5, no further fractures. Bone scan of spine showed previous fractures in the spine (13) healed well. I started the Forteo again because I was having back spasms and terrified of breaking again. I was to start Evenity, but having trouble getting it covered. Forteo was easily approved for another 2 years. I am thinking now I will just stay on Forteo, as Evenity seems to have more side effects and is very expensive. If my insurance does decide to cover it, they may not re-approve my Forteo. It's pretty bad that these medications cost so much money and all have risks. Forteo seems the least in that regard. Also, with not able to tolerate Prolia or Fosomax, I have a fairly clean slate to fully benefit from Forteo again.
With the black box warning removed from Forteo, you would think there would be more research interest in those of us braving another course of Forteo.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Hi Mayblin. Spine T-Score before Forteo was -4.1 and Femoral neck -2.8. They could not read..."

Thank you very much for your reply @broken13 . I'm sorry to hear that you have to deal with fractures, and am relieved to hear that you are being treated with an osteoanabolic again. The good part is that you are indeed in a relative clean slate - raloxifene, unlike other antiresorptives, is not known to blunt pth analogs' effect according to past clinical studies. That being said, the effects of retreatment with Forteo is yet to be studied thoroughly. Also, the sequence from Forteo (or Tymlos) to evenity or vice versa definitely need to be explored in clinical studies. Please keep us posted with your bone journey and wish you the best!