Effects of HRT: Alone, in Combination or Sequencing

Posted by mayblin @mayblin, 5 days ago

Have you used HRT as the sole modality for osteopenia or osteoporosis? How about using it in a therapy sequence or in combination with another osteodrug, either an anabolic or an antiresorptive? What is the outcome of such choice(s)?

After a diagnosis of osteoporosis nearly 3 years ago, I elected Forteo as my first drug therapy then transitioned to HRT afterwards. Forteo gave me a jump start on building bones: lumbar bmd +8.6%, hips r/l +4.8/2.2%, femur necks r/l +8.9/3.4%. Bmd improvements are as follows after 22mo Forteo followed by 6mo HRT (scans were done with same machine and by same tech):

Lumbar spine bmd +18%, T score from -3.4 to -2.3;
Right hip bmd +9%, T score from -2.3 to -1.8;
Left hip bmd +4.1%, T score from -2.1 to -1.8;
Right femur neck bmd +16%, T score from -2.4 to -1.6;
Left femur neck bmd +9.8%, T score from -2.5 to -2.0;
TBS from 1.264 to 1.322

So far so good but I know this is just the start of a long road ahead.

I’m very grateful for the existence of Mayo Clinic Connect. Without this forum I’d never thought HRT would be in the cards as I’m more than 10 years past menopause. Many thanks to @vkmov for initiating the thread “Transdermal HRT”, @teb for her generous sharing of personal experiences, and countless members for their in depth discussions and suggestions.

The inclusion of HRT in the management of osteoporosis isn’t mainstream, in fact it is not approved for the treatment of osteoporosis so data and evidence are lacking. It will be helpful if we could share the outcomes of HRT among those of us who have chosen to use HRT under the care of our team of physicians. Dexa results possibly with bone turnover markers and/or TBS info if available will be nice. By the way, my CTX trended down to 163 after 6mo HRT from a high of 793 at end of Forteo treatment, a change I didn’t anticipate at all.

Any comments or analysis are welcome; and best luck to us all no matter what therapy path(s) we choose!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

@janetroberson1

Women's health issues have rarely gotten the attention they deserve. Most gynecologists don't receive training -- or it is limited -- in medical school. It's very difficult to identify a doctor who is well versed in issues regarding menopause and osteoperosis. A recent source of information is: https://menopause.org/. This website provides the names of medical practitioners (doctors and nurses) who have been certified as knowledgeable about menopause. I'm switching from my gynecologist (competent, but very focused on delvering babies and not on menopausal women) to a doctor who has been certified.

Jump to this post

Or simply interview the doctor and ask about their education, expertise and length of time in treating patients with those needs. It's like a job interview....what qualifies you to treat my _____fill in the blank.

REPLY

Unfortunately, the Women’s Health Initiative back in the early 2000’s influenced physicians to not use HRT for post menopausal women. I believe many women suffered after this flawed study and there are still physicians out there that have not updated their knowledge base. Very frustrating for women and my hope is that my daughter and granddaughter will have better care than I do as they age. I feel like I am fighting with my rheumatologist and gynecologist. Have an appointment with an endocrinologist a few counties away, but it isn’t until 2026 he is so busy. Hoping I can stay stable until then.

REPLY
@lhankins

Unfortunately, the Women’s Health Initiative back in the early 2000’s influenced physicians to not use HRT for post menopausal women. I believe many women suffered after this flawed study and there are still physicians out there that have not updated their knowledge base. Very frustrating for women and my hope is that my daughter and granddaughter will have better care than I do as they age. I feel like I am fighting with my rheumatologist and gynecologist. Have an appointment with an endocrinologist a few counties away, but it isn’t until 2026 he is so busy. Hoping I can stay stable until then.

Jump to this post

Any functional medicine providers in your area?
Curious to know what your docs give as their rationale for denying bhrt.

REPLY
@gravity3

Any functional medicine providers in your area?
Curious to know what your docs give as their rationale for denying bhrt.

Jump to this post

I have not found anyone in a two county area who believes in bhrt. Granted, I have not had appointments with everyone. But I have talked to many women in my area who are in the same pickle and running into this brick wall. The rational I have received from all of them is cardiovascular risks. My father suffered from heart disease and had a heart attack at age 51. He was an athlete. My mother had deep vein thrombosis in her mid forties and then suffered mini strokes as she aged. I believe they see me as high risk for a cardiac event; specifically based on that flawed study. To that point; to date I have no heart issues. I’ve always been active; no high blood pressure. So in conclusion, I think they fear liability.

REPLY

@gravity3
One last thing, I believe my current physicians are pressured by the insurance companies as well.

REPLY
@lhankins

@gravity3
One last thing, I believe my current physicians are pressured by the insurance companies as well.

Jump to this post

I've come to similar conclusions.

REPLY
@kisu

After conducting thorough research, I’m not concerned about my breast cancer risk. I’m part of the "Wisdom" breast cancer study, which is open to women 74 and under. The study includes genetic testing for 29 mutations associated with breast cancer, and I don’t have any of these mutations. In 2012, I had a 23andMe test for BRCA1 and BRCA2, and I’ve since had it redone through the Wisdom study. I’ve always maintained healthy habits.

My main concern is my heart health. I have cardiovascular disease (CVD) and, not surprisingly, 15 genetic risks for CVD (such as Apo(a), APOB, APOE4, thin caps, etc.). I’m worried because my cardiologist is not up-to-date on hormone knowledge. He believes estrogen causes breast cancer, but I know that’s incorrect. Given that he’s misinformed on this topic, I’m unsure if I can trust his advice about using a .05 estrogen patch and 4mg of testosterone. Does he fully understand the risks of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for someone with my cardiovascular risks?

It’s possible he wasn’t educated about women’s hormones and their relationship to cardiovascular health during medical school. I could seek a third opinion, but what if that cardiologist also advises against HRT? How do I know which doctor to believe? I had to wait five months for an appointment with my current cardiologist and four months for my first one. Should I wait another five months for a third opinion?

It took me two and a half years to find a doctor willing to prescribe HRT. Navigating the healthcare system, staying informed about current HRT options, osteopenia/osteoporosis, and the latest CVD research has felt like a full-time job. If it weren’t for forums and knowledgeable doctors sharing information through social media podcasts, I would feel lost and alone.

I find some reassurance in knowing that cardiovascular events for older women who begin HRT usually occur in the first year of use and tend to diminish after that. I’m currently in my ninth month of HRT.

I acknowledge that this is a tough decision, especially since the risks and benefits for women over 70 starting hormones are not well understood. I appreciate everything you’ve shared and am grateful for forums like this one.

Jump to this post

Wow, you've done a fair amount of work for an informed and shared decision.

I've only done LPa for ASCVD genetic testing, and thought APO-E is for neurodegenerative risk. My understanding is LPa and APO-B are most atherogenic where high LPa is not treatable. But since LDL-c is routinely tested it became the "proxy" for atherogenic burden although for some people the two may not correlate to each other. Please correct any misunderstanding here from your knowledge base.

Which calculation method do you use for your 10 year cvd risk? I've used MESA which takes cac score into account. The calculated risk is below 2%. But this calculated risk is based on the LDL-c level that was controlled below target value by a statin and heart healthy diet. I have a feeling cardiologists know this very well based on labs/tests, medical history and family history.

You are at a unique position to use HRT for your osteopenia to prevent/stop bone loss. I wonder how often you get dexa scan and if you monitor bone markers. I'm keen to see how testosterone in the mix would affect bone markers. If you test them and could share, it will be great to to observe testosterone effect, even at the very low dose you are getting,

REPLY
@wildapple50

Look up Menopause Taylor on YouTube. She is a gyno who has done hundreds of videos on HRT and women's health.

Jump to this post

I’ve watched many of Menopause Taylor’s videos, and she offers in-depth information, especially for younger women, focusing on prevention. She provides an excellent service for healthy younger women. However, at 74 years old with cardiovascular disease (CVD), my situation requires a more individualized approach. It seems I am a borderline case, which is why I keep being referred to a cardiologist.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.