← Return to Gleason 7 (4+3) radiation, but ADT also? Over treatment?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@bandit11

David, my PSA had been increasing for several years and my PCP sent me to a urologist. It turns out that because I had been taking medication to help reduce the number of night "pee" trips, my actual PSA was double (9) the number that was indicated by yearly lab tests.
A biopsy was quickly performed which when reviewed by a pathologist indicated 6 out of 12 cores contained cancer , four of which were 4+3 with the remaining two 3 + 3.
Consulted with a urologist and radiologist both of which indicated ADT was required. In the meantime, I had an MRI to look for any spread and had a 2nd pathologist from John's Hopkins perform a review of the cores which confirmed the findings of the first pathologist,
I had to wait several weeks to have a PSMA pet scan to look for spread and it confirmed there was none outside of the prostate. Your research has probably made you aware that a PSMA pet scan is significantly more effective than an MRI in finding cancer outside the prostate .

Jump to this post


Replies to "David, my PSA had been increasing for several years and my PCP sent me to a..."

(continued) I had a Decipher test performed which evaluates the aggressiveness of your particular cancer and mine was slightly below the mid range.
Decided I was leaning toward Proton Therapy and consulted with Proton Therapy radiologist who also strongly recommended ADT.
Consulted with widely known 2nd Proton Therapy radiologist who indicated that he believed expected lifespan gain from ADT was largely, but certainly not completely, offset by negative health effects it can bring.