← Return to Received MRI Results Today

Discussion

Received MRI Results Today

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 4 days ago | Replies (74)

Comment receiving replies
@heavyphil

Jeff, I wish I wasn’t so bad at copying and pasting! The gist of Dr Barsky’s article is that PNI is NOT associated with post surgical Gleason upgrading. And that PNI offers - in a perverse way - a clearer look into the actual “Gleason-ness” of the original presurgical biopsy.
In my own case I had PNI in perhaps six cores out of twelve. I was diagnosed with Gleason 4+3 unfavorable. My surgical pathology report remained the same - no 5’s detected.
Of course, here I am 5 yrs later having salvage radiation so my cancer was obviously more aggressive. My doctors at Sloan however, ascribe this more to the surgeon’s laxness at doing complete lymph dissection than pure aggressiveness.
So the spread of the cells toward the neural sheath -PNI- does, in fact, point to a more aggressive type of cell but not one that has necessarily escaped into the surrounding tissues.
Best

Jump to this post


Replies to "Jeff, I wish I wasn’t so bad at copying and pasting! The gist of Dr Barsky’s..."

Yes, he did say it was not more aggressive with “clinically localized prostate cancer.” If it has spread outside of prostate, then PNI wasn’t studied.

Another ASCO Study Found much higher rates of reoccurrence with PNI. The people that had PNI Had an 19% chance of reoccurrence and 3.1% for other people in the study that did not have PNI.

As I mentioned, I did find multiple places on the web where they said it was more aggressive.