Received MRI Results Today
Hi Brothers,
My high PSA numbers (~ 12) led to me getting an MRI last week. Today I have the results and they are concerning. The highlights are:
One large lesion 2.7 x 1.7 x 2.5 cm in left peripheral zone.
One smaller lesion (0.8 cm) in right anterior mid-gland.
No lymphadenopathy.
No suspicious bone lesions.
PSA density is 0.45.
I'm not sure what this all means and I'm in a bit of a shock. I just wonder if anyone has had a similar diagnosis. I would appreciate any comments or opinions. I haven't had a medical consultation yet so the grading is not identified. I'm 84 and otherwise very healthy and active.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
No kidding
So sorry to hear this. Did you get antibiotics the day before the biopsy? I was told for my upcoming biopsy I'd be taking an anti-biotic the day before, the day of, and the day after.
I’m at the crossroads of new results after 2019-2020 AS , now
PSA 16
Gleason 3+3 6
6/12 cores with cancer
PNI at 2 locations
Not sure what treatment to choose ?
They say these other issues require treatment even given Gleason of 6 .
Looking at RALP or Proton guided Radiation
Difficult to decide , any information to help away my decision??
Sway
Stew, what they give you is HARDLY enough to make up for puncturing your bacteria filled rectum 12 times and injecting….um…shit… into your body.
I’ve done simple dental cleanings on some patients with mitral valve issues, premedicated them with 2 grams of Amoxicillin and they’ve wound up hospitalized for a week with cardiac infections.
Get the TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY!
I would normally say with a Gleason 6 you don’t do anything, but the PNI means that the cancer has spread outside the prostate. Even though Gleason six, isn’t really considered cancer by many doctors, yours has pretty much proven itself to be cancer.
It could be that your Gleason score is higher, but they’re just not getting biopsy samples from the right area. My Gleason score was 3+4 before surgery and 4+3 after. I know people that have gone from 3+4 to 9 after surgery, So it’s hard to rely on the Biopsy all the time.
Both choices you have outlined would probably work quite well, But I suspect that if you have surgery, they would want to do IMRT radiation, since it’s already spread outside the prostate.
Are you being treated at a center of excellence? Getting opinions From more than one Radiation oncologist And urologist, Asking about the need for radiation after surgery, could give you more information about what direction to choose.
Thanks for this concern you raise. I wonder if doing a 'cleanse' (i.e. like before a colonoscopy) would be beneficial.
I don't know, but I'm guessing not. The fecal bacteria is still there; the cleanse is just to remove any bits of feces large enough to affect the accuracy of the colonoscopy.
Next question (can you tell I'm focused? Maybe more than I should be). Has anyone been diagnosed with a 'trabeculated' bladder wall? Apparently it's related to chronic outlet obstruction.
I agree with @northoftheborder in that a cleanse will not remove the bacteria. One study a few years ago (Hopkins?) showed that a simple povidone iodine suppository inserted one hour before the procedure cut the risk of infection by something like 98%. Please research this! Unfortunately no one does this simple step….
But it may be something for you to do on your own if you think you are going to go ahead with the trans rectal biopsy, in spite of all the posters who have suggested the trans perineal option. Have a feeling your urologist might scoff at the idea but maybe your primary care doc can get you an RX if one is necessary.
Also, I did have trabeculation in my bladder but it all went away after the obstruction (prostate!) was removed.