← Return to Received MRI Results Today
Discussion
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 5 days ago | Replies (74)
Comment receiving replies
Replies to "@stew80 You mention in passing that you are 84 and that changes the treatment options because..."
I’m not sure whether you are saying he doesn’t need a biopsy because at his age he still will live long enough if he does nothing. That may be true if he has a Gleason seven or less, but with a Gleason eight or above, it could become aggressive quite quickly and it could cause pain, Usually bone pain to start. @
After the biopsy, you can figure out whether or not you want to do treatment
Thank you for this detailed response. Lots to review - the data and reality of my situation. I am 84 and fortunately a very healthy 84 (except for the prostate issues). 8.7 years more would be good. I'm greedy so I'd even like to exceed that. I began to read Dr. Walsh's book and one statement stands out. "The prostate gland does much more harm than good and is located in a terrible area that complicates treatment attempts." Anyway, I'll read on. Lots of good stuff to assess.
I'm going to search for the possibility of finding a transperineal biopsy option locally for all the reasons I've read here. With the identification of 2 lesions I assume they will want the grid 12 cores and then 6 or so more from the lesions.
My concern is a sense that I'm bypassing my assigned urologist who I haven't actually spoken to yet.