← Return to Recent diagnosis: Have questions about treatment options?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@carrie40

This sounds so similar to me--but I'm an 84 year old woman, but like you, very healthy--no medications except for glaucoma. I was sick as a dog with the chemo--never have recovered my weight (almost 2 years--120 pounds to 95). It was the chemo with the FlorETC--I'm not as good with the medical terms as some, but the pump at home 2 nights; had to quit after 2 sessions and went for the Whipple. Like you, my antigen was 153.
THIS IS AN OPTIMISTIC NOTE TO YOU. I never went back to chemo, though strongly encouraged to. One year after surgery I had radiation for a mesenteric mass--now it has decreased as the radiologist said it would. I have been feeling great for over a year and have decided to only do radiation, which had minimal side effects if any. I have read several other positive results from radiation--PLEASE LOOK INTO RADIATION, the new type that targets. I only knew about it as my 85 year old husband had it for prostate cancer, sailed through it for one month driving himself 50 miles for treatment. I was impressed--no return of his cancer, but ongoing tests of course. I kept asking my oncologist about it, but on my own saw the radiologist who did not promise anything--did not want to compete was my impression. But I have read in this group that others have had good results with minimal life style impact.
I like what "marky..." has written you. I say the Whipple first; you will have new information then about lymph nodes, etc. so you can make a better decision about chemo. And look into radiation; not always recommended by oncologists (mine didn't) as they legitimately want to cure and wipe out every bit of cancer EVER. My radiologist did not promise that, but frankly I'm reading many who have recurring cancers after chemo too.
It has been 2 years since my diagnosis and I am having a normal life, feeling good, impressing my friends who thought I would be a goner. But 2 years as an 84 year old with no small children is way different from you--I'm thrilled for these years. I understand you have a life ahead of you--just look into radiation and immunology too. I think they are the future of cancer treatments. Best wishes...you have a good attitude and are facing the problem. You will make it and be there for your family.

Jump to this post


Replies to "This sounds so similar to me--but I'm an 84 year old woman, but like you, very..."

Thanks for sharing, Carrie! It's very uplifting to hear your experience. I'm going to look into radiation options but so far all my doctors have said chemo--whether before or after the surgery or both. Did you have to go against your oncologist's recommendation to do radiation only or did they support your wishes?

@carrie40 I am 80 years old and my doctor told me I probably have pancreatic cancer. He determined this from the results of CT and MRI, a positive ANA titer and elevated CA199. He scheduled me for a EUS to be done on November 27. I called Mayo Clinic and was given a video/phone appointment on November 20. The interview was with nurse Ashley from Pancreas Clinic Pre-Visit. Ashley told me that Mayo would prefer to do the EUS there rather than at university of Chicago. She also said that it was very expensive and my insurance would not pay for it twice so I canceled my EUS appointment and agreed to have it done at Mayo. Ashley told me it would be one to two weeks before I heard when my onsite appointment at Mayo was scheduled. I did contact Mayo a few times to find out about my pancreatic appointment. I was told each time that test are ordered but not scheduled. Today I learned that I am on a waitlist of 2 to 3 months. I was shocked. I wish someone would’ve told me this sooner. I feel like precious time has been wasted. Pancreatic cancer doesn’t waste time However you have given me. Hope when I read your message I thought wow I can do it too. I just won’t be doing it at Mayo. I guess thank you God bless you.