← Return to Significant osteoporosis: I need a bone plan

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@hollygs

@windyshores I agree, it is confusing! This is one of the reasons why medical professionals might bemoan patients using Dr Google. Ideally, our chosen specialist would be able and amenable to providing clarification about these seeming discrepancies as they apply to our individual case. At least one article I've read supported the use of monitoring BTMs as patients may have to wait for their DTX. There are also varying opinions about the optimal time to get a DTX, sometimes related specifically to the drug used and sometimes not. I don't understand how a doctor can decide on what sequence their patient will follow if they don't know what their response has been. Sometimes a protocol is established and followed to the letter, but sometimes it isn't. I think that this field is relatively new and ever-evolving. That may be exciting academically but challenging personally.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@windyshores I agree, it is confusing! This is one of the reasons why medical professionals might..."

@hollygs I wish there was a "100%" button for your post!

My main endo doesn't use bone markers, and my other endo does. Keith McCormick is very big on them. Each has their reasons. Ugh.

Researchers, doctors and drug companies didn't know that bisphosphonates could cause atypical femur fracture or jaw necrosis; they didn't know about Prolia rebound; they didn't know that Evenity is only anabolic at first. The warning of osteosarcoma for Forteo and Tymlos was withdrawn.

There doesn't seem to be consensus on certain sequences due to lack of studies, and insurance policy still prioritizes anti-resorptive that affect effectiveness of anabolics. There don't seem to be established long term protocols for those of us who have to stay on meds long term.

I do wonder if this was not mostly a women' s disease, if research might be more advanced.