Lumpectomy or mastectomy that is the dilema. Any insight would help.

Posted by mjmac @mjmac, Aug 8 5:52pm

Hello,
I have been reading posts since shortly after I was diagnosed in early June with ILC. It has been quite informative, has made me hopeful, and I am greatful that this sight and you all exist to help with the feelings of helplessness an uncertainy when diagnosed with BC.
It has taken this long to get all of my tests and I am now to the point of making a decision about treatment. My bone & PT scans were clear, 3 lymph nodes tested positive and my onco score is 11. The tumor is border line for lumpectomy and my surgeon has given me a choice of staying on Letrozole and shrinking tumor size for lumpectomy or having a L breast mastectomy. Everything in me just wants the cancer out of my body but is that the best solution? Any input on both procedures would be most helpful. Thank you!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.

heidiell67, I had the skin sparing and i stayed my same small size. It has made me look somewhat normal. Except I have barbie boobs, not keeping and breast tissue at all. Wearing my V-neck shirts, my chest skin looks the same. It is amazing. My plastic surgeon and breast surgeon were excellent. I had a tumor that barely shrunk with 13 rounds of chemo and grew fast. None of us are the same. Once our girls are gone, that is it. We must make the choice that is right for us.

REPLY

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

One more thought…I’m 67. Certainly comfortable with no breasts and occasional use of prosthesis, so I’d go flat.

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

@grannyb I had a ki67% of 19, just over the line in 2015 (yours isn't too high). Here is an article on ki67% https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8487652/ In 2015 my doctors considered it unreliable so some hospital had it, some didn't.

I was also ER+ PR+ HER2- and grade 3 with lymphovascular invasion. BUT a low Oncotype. Even with grade 3 and those other factors. The Oncotype is a test done with your pathology (sometimes with biopsy, preferably after surgery) and includes the ki67% and some other proliferation factors. You can still do an Oncotype with 1-3 lymph nodes positive.

The Oncotype tells you whether you would benefit from chemo and also gives risk with and without aromatase inhibitors.

This is all just fyi. As to your original question, it is a personal choice. Every doctor tells us the risk is the same with either lumpectomy or mastectomy.

I chose two mastectomies (doctors wanted me to try one first due to lupus, to see how I handled it) and wetn flat. I don't actually wear prostheses but lots of people do. The mastectomy on the non-cancer breast showed a lot of cysts but also atypical dysplasia (Possibly pre-cancerous) so I was glad I did it. But plenty of women have lumpectomies and do fine!

I was like you- I didn't want one gone. I was told I had a legal right to symmetry!!

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

I don’t want to talk you out of a mastectomy but there is another option to consider than just a lumpectomy on one side.
I was a 34DD, 68 yr old. I had right side non-invasive DCIS so my decision was a little different. However, I asked for a lumpectomy with oconoplastic surgery to reshape the right breast, with surgery on the left breast for symmetry.
The law that says they must provide an option for symmetry has no consequence if they don’t do it. So it is more like a guideline. But it sounds like most facilities will do surgery to make both breasts similar.
When the plastic surgeon discussed what was going to be done during the pre-op appointment, I said I’d prefer the end result to be smaller breasts as I’ve never been comfortable with large breasts.
My surgery was listed as a lumpectomy with oconoplastic surgery and mastoplexy on right, and a mastoplexy on left for symmetry. I am now about a C+ cup on each side. I did have 5 days of radiation. It was 30 Gy in 5 hypofractionation to partial breast. With invasive cancer, whole breast hypofractionation is more often done I think. I am on tamoxifen for minimum 5 years.
I don’t know which option is best for you, but just wanted you to know that a breast reduction on both sides might be possible.

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

@triciaot Rubyslippers brings up another point. My doctors didn't want me to have radiation and I didn't want it either. I was told one in five radiologists would have wanted me to have radiation even with the mastectomy. In general, lumpectomy means radiation and sometimes (often?) mastectomy avoids it.

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

Greetings,
This year I was diagnosed with invasive dc (er/pr+, her2-) after much research and prayer I chose dmx with Goldilocks procedure and am super pleased with outcome. Here is more info https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/patient-stories/goldilocks-for-breast-reconstruction
This was a nice middle of the road option for me.
Prayers that you find peace in your decision and are surrounded with a loving and supportive team!

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

I was 60. Similar- I chose a lumpectomy and reconstruction on both. Hormone+ her- grade 1. On left breast DCIS was 4cm, IDC was 1.9 mm…. They couldn’t do a onco test too small. I had 15 days radiation. I am currently on exestamane - anastrozole did not agree with my body. I didnt want a mastectomy. And my surgeon was fine with that. I was a D and now am a C.

REPLY
@grannyb

I have been diagnosed with Invasive Ductal c. It is R+, P+, and HER2 -, Ki67 is 23% and Grade 3. (Nottingham score?). It is Stage 1 because the tumor is small- 1 cm. Oncologist feels all is needed is lumpectomy, but of course gave me options of lumpectomy, mast. And bilateral. Lymph nodes look ok in scans but won’t know till surgical pathology. I went to a natural osteopath for a second opinion and he was fine with lumpectomy, but when I asked what he’d do if it was his wife, he said double mast, because of the type of cancer and proliferation rate- which is in the high range. Oncologists are thinking there will be no radiation or chemo needed, but of course post surgical pathology on lymph nodes is needed. Then followed by aromatase med. I have had several people- medical and BC survivors recommend go ahead with double mast. What are your thoughts and experiences? I am a larger breasted 44c-d gal and don’t like the option of only one mastectomy so it’s either lumpectomy or both in my mind.

Jump to this post

Hi. I was diagnosed with a rare triple negative cancer in the left breast end of September 2024. The mri, high compression mammogram and ultrasound showed no signs of cancer in the right breast. After careful thought, I chose a double mastectomy vs a lumpectomy.

Of course, I was sad to lose my original breasts. However:
1) I did not want to worry about cancer showing up in the right breast or reoccurring at all.

2) I wanted a good cosmetic outcome; it matters to me what I look like when I come out of the shower and look in the mirror.

My nipple-sparing bilateral mastectomy was 10/23/2024. In my right breast, they did find “atypical cells” that had not appeared on any of the prior testing. So I am very glad I had the bilateral mastectomy.

I have tissue expanders now and will have another surgery in 2 months to have implants, along with fat grafting from my tummy to even put the breasts.

My breasts already look good! Most importantly, I am cancer free.

The tissue expanders hurt. This is a hard journey. But I know that for me i absolutely made the right choice. I have an excellent care team at a highly rated hospital.

Best of luck to you. Everyone’s choice is personal. (I am 59.)

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.