← Return to Newly Diagnosed: Removal vs Radiation

Discussion

Newly Diagnosed: Removal vs Radiation

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 4 days ago | Replies (62)

Comment receiving replies
@peterj116

I went with surgery. I also had Gleeson 7 (4+3) and I'm 60 years old.
I looked at surgery vs radiation & among other things, it seems that surgery can cause bladder incontinence but radiation could cause bladder AND bowel incontinence.
Bowel incontinence was a hard No for me.

Also, I've read that if you go for radiation & they don't get all of the cancerous cells, surgery later becomes salvage surgery.
My understanding is that the radiation may cause parts of the prostate to turn to mush & the later surgery will then involve scraping the mush from the prostate cavity.
That's probably as accurate & successful as it sounds.

I also wasn't keen on multiple days off work for numerous radiation sessions.

That's my uneducated understanding, anyway.
What do I know... I'm just sitting here peeing myself.

Good luck.
You've come to the right place for guys who understand what you're going through.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I went with surgery. I also had Gleeson 7 (4+3) and I'm 60 years old. I..."

All roads lead to misery in this situation it seems. I get what you are saying, if the risk was bowel incontinence then I would be hard pressed to agree to that either. It all makes me just want to curl up into a ball honestly.