← Return to Why does the medical field shy away from toxic neuropathy?

Discussion

Why does the medical field shy away from toxic neuropathy?

Neuropathy | Last Active: Oct 28 2:08pm | Replies (27)
Comment receiving replies
@jenatsky

If you read that info sheet I sent you you’ll see there are no specific glove specs that I could see. The complexities of the issue should be dealt with by an attorney who are familiar with this crap. I do not necessarily agree with your conjectures about the product handling but I wasn’t there. If I were you I’d cease everything on my own and let my attorney do it. You realize you will pay nothing for the attorney up front and only when the case settles are they paid as well as you.

Jump to this post

Replies to "If you read that info sheet I sent you you’ll see there are no specific glove..."
fairwinds24 | @fairwinds24 | Oct 28 10:46am

thanks for your continued support...the SDS sheet for the product gets around the PPE issue by saying " no special PPE required", with the word special being key...otherwise they could simply say no PPE required, and that would be total negligence given the recommended application methods for the product to be effective

section 2 Hazards ID has the dilluted solution listed with specified categories chart in section 16. other information...if there was proper risk assessment done by aramark as to the chemicals being used they could tell what kind of gloves should be used during rigorous multitasking expected of the EVS worker...the whole issue is the cost of decent gloves to keep dermal absorption from happening...4 cents a pair compared to 1.00 is a lot of profit to aramarks bottom line every year

VIEW AND REPLY