Tulsa Pro - share your experiences
I want to thank all for support on my recent prostate cancer treatment, Tulsa pro. I am very thankful to my wife and my daughter who helped out lots with support. I am thankful to Mayo for finally finding the extent of the problem with a transperineal biopsy. I am also very thankful to Dr Scionti in Sarasota for being a true expert for the Tulsa procedure. Tulsa leaves everything intact except for the prostate cancer tissue plus some tissue as a safety margin near it. It goes nowhere near sphincters and nerves. I was very glad to not have any extra prostatic cancer, or cancer in seminal vesicles, ducts, nerves etc. I did have PSMA scan showing this. We will just have to see if everything works out in the long run cancer wise.
What I had cancer wise
Originally in 2021 I had a small spot seen in transition zone. It got some 3+3 more toward back where they could reach via trans rectal biopsy (done at a local university), but they could not reach the anterior where most of it was in 2021. My 2023 Mayo done transperineal biopsy had one needle at the anterior transition zone with all Gleason 4, it was not a big spot (0.2 mm caught in needle). Keep in mind in 2021 further to back it had just Gleason 3. I am not going to get caught up in Gleason scores, I know what was sampled in past, and though one needle had 4 in the front/top of anterior it was just a tiny spot in this tumor and most toward posterior was not hit here in 2023. There was also a small 3+4 on one side seen now in 2023. My PSA headed up steadily during the 2.75 years on surveillance. My final prostate size before any treatment was 110 cc, and final PSA around 16.
What worked on biopsy, and what did not.
2021: Trans rectal in 2021 biopsy did not sample well, missed most of what is in anterior transition zone and one of my problem areas. But since then, I have had plenty of time to read on things like Tulsa pro, radiation types, and so on. So was glad to have the time.
2023: Mayo Transperineally done biopsy caught the problems.
Some things I learned about MRI
What I learned is that, for me at least, diffusion weighted MRI shows very clearly what docs need to see to treat. Regular contrast enhanced MRI left my doctors not that sure, sometimes even confused. Diffusion weighted MRI to me was crystal clear where things were and what needed to be treated. Only Dr Scionti seemed geared up for diffusion weighted MRI. That includes other places I asked for initial consult, and Mayo that I went to for a while – all geared up for contrast enhanced MRI only really seemed like.
Who does new kinds of treatments.
Mayo is top notch for advanced cancers that have spread, but I learned they are just starting out with other new treatments like Tulsa Pro. I liked Mayo’s proton as a possibility, but they have filled many slots for it, and sometimes it is hard to get through insurance from what they said to me. They also do everything under protocols, they have to develop those for these new treatments of any kind since everyone looks at Mayo. So in some ways they are behind a bit, having to do everything with a protocol instead of just looking out for what is best for one individual patient. Thus, I found I had to call around if I wanted anything new. Some places are better than others seemed like to me at calling places. The best I heard from was Dr Scionti in Sarasota.
Before Tulsa for me
Because the size of my prostate was large, and one needle had all Gl 4, we did bicalutamide and dutasteride for several months. They want that temperature up during Tulsa at the top so while I still met the Tulsa size limits we shrunk things a bit to be sure.
Travel
I had to travel to Sarasota, about a 22 hour drive for me. Found a nice Airbnb down there not too far away. I drove since date of coming back was uncertain. I wanted his office to take catheter out, others might fly and self remove catheter I understand, but I was unsure about that. It is good I rented an Airbnb for more than two weeks is all I can say.
Tulsa procedure
Obviously asleep, seemed to go well. They took out about 2/3 of the prostate tissue with the Tulsa pro. The before and after MRI done while asleep clearly shows the tumors on diffusion weighted MRI, and post procedure MRI with contrast show those same areas treated well and no longer there. Woke up with the bladder spasms a real lot, oxybutynin seemed to really help but it was hard to wake up with Foley catheter and the spasms. Next day the spasms were gone, but it was tough to sit. For ten days with Foley catheter, I watched old Dr Who, movies, and obviously just sleeping. A restful period is the best help, not having to do much was important for me at least. Foley catheter for ten days was no fun but it wasn’t as hard as I imagined perhaps.
Post catheter
Was a bit tough, I still had some inflammation perhaps worse than some get, plus there is scar tissue for up to 6 months, so it was hard to pee. Alpha blocker was a must just to pee. Another couple weeks brings me to now at this writing and it is a lot easier to pee. But it was a hard travel back. I suggest stay in an Airbnb for some time post procedure plus give plenty of time after catheter is out.
Future
We will see if this all worked on the cancer over next year or two, and on after that. Hoping for no recurrence of course.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Nope not on dutasteride, I did do that for a few months before Tulsa Pro. I am trying some new things, will let you know later if it helps on BPH.
I have been on Dutasteride for 4 1/2 years . My Lab PSA is 8.2 i.e. 16.4
Six cores cancerous " 4 Gleason 6 -- 2 Gleason 3 + 4 = 7 Age 84 past in April , Currently on AS
Consideriing NanoKnife or TULSA - PRO .
That is great you want to try something, Tulsa Pro was not hard, so one can get through it. The catheter is just a bother to empty bag and so on, then it is all done. Another one out there is vanquish, there is a list of places doing it on clinicaltrials.gov
Thanks for the update .
Vanquish apparently is not applicable to someone like myself who is taking medication , E.G. Dutasteride , which has an effect on your PSA . ( Dutasteride - The doubling effect .)
Hi @clandeboye1 On Vanquish and removing you from consideration.... that is because it is in a clinical trial, they eliminate most of the people in order to get data they feel is clear to see results, or not burdened by other factors. Sometimes it is like that you have to go with other options.
I do think Tulsa Pro is a very good option for you and most people out there. One can handle it, it has low side effects if done well, I think it has a great future. I did look a little bit at nanoknife, most of what I read wasn't great but I never spoke to any doctors doing it. It is up to you, but Tulsa is easy enough, not saying it is fun but one can take it without that much to worry about and at your age you don't want a lot of worry so maybe it is worth it if you have to do something that is.
Thanks for your input .
I know several individuals who have had the NanoKnife procedure in both Germany and Canada . There are several locations performing the procedure in Toronto alone . All are delighted by the results .
Another option on my consideration list is Monotherapy SBRT -- Any commentss ?
One of my associates had the SBRT with hormone therapy plus , which I prefer to steer clear off at my age 85 .
I mean if one has to do radiation proton is the way to go. At any rate I have gone to several radiation visits with docs and the first thing they should hand you is a list of side effects probable or possible based on your conditions and the treatment they plan. They never do it, they just ask if you have questions. Radiation has lots of side effects. I wouldn't have it as my first choice.
Apart from Focal Therapy issues - it appears that a 5 treatment SBRT is the lessor of all evils .
radiation damages can occur for years after, but usually not right away, so undercounting of problems and damages from radiation is widepsread.
I agree , years later . But remember how many more years do I have . I am approaching 85 .