@domiha ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) is the name of the procedure to remove discs and fuse from the frontal approach. The reason for 2 surgeries is that there must be 2 different surgical paths, one from the front (anterior) to access removal of discs and placing spacers or cages. You can't access that from the back of the spine because you cannot severe the spinal cord that is right behind the discs to get to the discs. The rods must be attached on the back of the vertebrae on both sides and you can't do that with a patient on the table laying on their back.
There are other factors like how long does a surgery take with however many levels that are involved?, the anesthesia time, and fatigue of the surgical team. Most surgeons are standing on their feet leaning against and over the table to operate which is tiring, If you compare that to washing dishes leaning over at a sink, you have probably experienced back, neck and shoulder fatigue. Imagine doing that for 4 to 5 hours. I know my single level cervical fusion required about an hour of surgeon time, the rest was the pre-surgery prep and setting up the sterile field and anesthesia and breathing machines. The surgeon needs to know they will do a good job, and doing surgery with excessive fatigue is not a good choice. On long extended surgeries, sometimes there is a 2nd surgical team that comes in to continue the procedure. There are also the schedules of other hospital workers involved with surgeries and they try to keep to an expected schedule to accommodate operating room time schedules among all the patient surgeries being done there with various surgeons. Between every case, the operating room must be cleaned and sterilized and a freshly sterilized set of instruments and supplies is brought in for the the next procedure.
If your surgeon was to add rods at the same time, it would require turning an anesthetized patient over on a narrow table without disturbing any of the work they just completed. Then the sterile fields would need to be set up again. I understand not wanting 2 surgeries, but that is standard practice for how this is done. They have to do what has the least risks to the patient.
Thank you so much for your reply, Jennifer.... and also for all the work you do here as a volunteer mentor. And yes, I can certainly understand that long surgeries would be very tiring on the surgeon and staff. Some people have replied in this thread saying that they had decompression with rods done only through the back. (@dlydailyhope posted xray photos above). And I have heard of some people having the ALIF and that is it. So, I'm assuming the rods cannot be put in through the front with the ALIF?? And perhaps the surgeon would go in the next day to add rods because of the fact that I have already had a laminectomy L2-S1 and he wants to add more stability to that portion of my spine. He is an excellent surgeon, so I feel totally confident he knows what he is talking about! When I read or look at youtube videos regarding the ALIF, it is touted as "minimally invasive" and preferable to the back surgeries that were for years done only through the back. But if it is always a two-part surgery over two consecutive days, that hardly seems minimally invasive. All of this is stuff I will need to talk with the surgeon about, I know... I'm just trying to understand how some here could possibly have decompression and rods... through the back if, as you say, the disc tissue cannot be removed from the back?? When I google PLIF, it explains that disc tissue is removed and replaced with spacers, cages and rods are added for support. I am not trying to be argumentative... and I hope I'm not coming across that way. These are all things that I will discuss with the new neurosurgeon I am seeing for a second opinion in a month. And I will also discuss thoroughly with whatever surgeon I will choose IF I decide to have the surgery. Again, many thanks for your reply!! Best wishes! Mike