Laparoscopic prostatectomy?

Posted by peterj116 @peterj116, Sep 11 4:04pm

I just read the letter from the surgeon to my GP.
I'm having "a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy".
Does that mean it's not a robotic procedure?

If not, what's the difference in terms of procedure & outcome?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@twinlakes32

I had a laparoscopic robot assisted prostatectomy at Mayo in Rochester 18 months ago, on 3/21/2023. Surgery was 3 weeks after I talked with the surgeon. I was Gleason 3+4, with a small area of 3+5.

Jump to this post

If there is any 3+5, you are a 3+5 which means an 8 Gleason. Are you on ADT now?

REPLY
@jeffmarc

If there is any 3+5, you are a 3+5 which means an 8 Gleason. Are you on ADT now?

Jump to this post

No. The pathology report of my prostate after surgery was Gleason 3+4, stage 2.

REPLY
@twinlakes32

I had a laparoscopic robot assisted prostatectomy at Mayo in Rochester 18 months ago, on 3/21/2023. Surgery was 3 weeks after I talked with the surgeon. I was Gleason 3+4, with a small area of 3+5.

Jump to this post

Is your PSA undetectable now?

REPLY

According to my urologist at Mayo it is, saying it’s < 0.1.

REPLY

The 3 month and 6 month checks were at Mayo. Both were reported as < 0.1. PSA checks since then have been done up here in Duluth MN. 9 month was reported as 0.01. 12 month was 0.01. 15 month was 0.02. 18 month (done yesterday) was 0.03. I sent a message to Mayo when the 0.02 came in, and they responded that anything less than 0.1 is considered undetectable. I have an appointment with my urologist in Duluth next week, and I’m anxious to see what they have to say.

REPLY
@twinlakes32

No. The pathology report of my prostate after surgery was Gleason 3+4, stage 2.

Jump to this post

After surgery they are able to evaluate the full prostate and it sounds like they didn’t find any 3+5 when doing that evaluation. This is a case where you might have someone else evaluate your biopsy results and find that it’s not a 3+5.

My biopsy was a 3+4 But when they evaluated my prostate, it was a 4+3. I know a few other people who have the same thing happen.

REPLY
@twinlakes32

According to my urologist at Mayo it is, saying it’s < 0.1.

Jump to this post

Surprising that a Mayo doctor stated that < 0.1 is considered undetectable. My doctors consider anything measurable to be detectable, but less than 0.1 to be not actionable. Waiting for PSA to approach 0.20 before considered as a biological chemical recurrence and beginning next treatment.. However, measurements < 0.1 were used to track PSA doubling time and I was prepared for the next treatment as the PSA increased above 0.10

REPLY
@jsh327

Surprising that a Mayo doctor stated that < 0.1 is considered undetectable. My doctors consider anything measurable to be detectable, but less than 0.1 to be not actionable. Waiting for PSA to approach 0.20 before considered as a biological chemical recurrence and beginning next treatment.. However, measurements < 0.1 were used to track PSA doubling time and I was prepared for the next treatment as the PSA increased above 0.10

Jump to this post

My understanding is that different tests use different methods and have different ranges of reporting. Generally < x means that is the lower limit of the test used, so literally [on that test] the level was "undetectable." If another test has a lower limit of < 0.006, then 0.008 might be detectable [on this other test] but not "actionable."

REPLY

I’ve had my PSA level checked every three months for the past 2 1/2 years. The lab reports have been < 0.1 undetectable.

REPLY
@jsh327

Surprising that a Mayo doctor stated that < 0.1 is considered undetectable. My doctors consider anything measurable to be detectable, but less than 0.1 to be not actionable. Waiting for PSA to approach 0.20 before considered as a biological chemical recurrence and beginning next treatment.. However, measurements < 0.1 were used to track PSA doubling time and I was prepared for the next treatment as the PSA increased above 0.10

Jump to this post

The standard for undetectable in a PSA test has been < .1 for the 14 years I’ve had prostate cancer., at least according to more than one doctor/oncologist I’ve been involved with

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.