Gleason7(3+4) - treatment options recommendation

Posted by manojsmishra @manojsmishra, Aug 25 3:42pm

Got recently diagnosed with Gleason group 2, 7(3+4). Was in state of shock to know about the cancer.
I’m 56 year old and fortunately I’m with Mayo care since last decade.
Recommendation for me is to have prostatectomy as radiation therapy has long term implications. Took outside opinion also and same recommendation. But not sure how to deal post procedure with urge to urinate situation currently there.
Biggest thing is I’m hoping there is no recurrence occurring after this. Any suggestion/recommendation?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@robertmizek

Respectfully, let me clarify:

For the record, I confused Nanoknife (which uses electroporation to kill cancer cells using electricity) with Cycberknife which, according to their website delivers, targeted highly focused radiation. As I understand it both can be used for focal treatment of prostate cancer.

When radiation is used as the primary treatment for PCa the PSA drops until it hits its lowest post, referred in clinical terms as a nadir. It is not uncommon for the PSA to rise temporarily 18-24 after treatment. This is called a “bounce”. If treatment is successful the PSA hits a new nadir. Many professionals in the medical community consider that treatment has failed if PSA rises 2 points above the nadir or on consecutive tests.

Speaking not as a doctor but as an engineer that worked on medical devices I see potential for cure in some prostate cancer patients. I considered it in 2020 when I was originally diagnosed and my insurance wouldn’t cover the procedure. As with any other treatment, careful monitoring of PSA post treatment is critical to detect Biochemical Recurrence before it becomes a serious issue.

I received focal treatment in the form of low dose brachytherapy. My peak PSA was about 7.0 prior to treatment. I was sold on the premise that I’d be cured without risking incontinance or ED. The doctor had no established post treatment guidelines for PSA levels. As a result I was blindsided when after a steady then rapid rise is PSA I was diagnosed with Stage 4 Gleason 9 PCa. I hope that patients receiving treatment with Nanoknife have a care team that avoids the same as I had.

Here’s a link to reasonably recent published study on Nanoknife: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/12/2178

Good luck to you on your journey.

Jump to this post

Thanks . Now I totally understand your situation . I am also an engineer Mechanical & Aeronautical . I agree that post procedure monitoring with frequent PSA ( every 3 months at first ) followed by an MRI at no later than 12 - 14 months to determine if there are any concerning changes . I have my MRI , with & without contrast for improved quality , on the 3T machine not the older 1.5 model .
Keep well .

REPLY

Sorry you've joined the club! I am now 29 months post Radical Prostatectomy and just like you I was Gleason 3+4. I took the time to self-advocate(ie the CEO of my journey) over a few months of meeting with various surgeons, specialists and talking to those who've been through the various procedures. I met with Dr Leonard Marks and his impressive team out at UCLA twice. BUT mostly I drilled down deep into the various studies and statistics to filter the noise within the medical community and come to a well-reasoned and quantifiable decision. Radical Prostatectomy offered the best statistical outcome to remain on this side of the dirt over the short and long term. At 28 months my PSA levels remain at zero and I am happy with my outcome. GOOD LUCK!

REPLY
@robertmizek

Respectfully, let me clarify:

For the record, I confused Nanoknife (which uses electroporation to kill cancer cells using electricity) with Cycberknife which, according to their website delivers, targeted highly focused radiation. As I understand it both can be used for focal treatment of prostate cancer.

When radiation is used as the primary treatment for PCa the PSA drops until it hits its lowest post, referred in clinical terms as a nadir. It is not uncommon for the PSA to rise temporarily 18-24 after treatment. This is called a “bounce”. If treatment is successful the PSA hits a new nadir. Many professionals in the medical community consider that treatment has failed if PSA rises 2 points above the nadir or on consecutive tests.

Speaking not as a doctor but as an engineer that worked on medical devices I see potential for cure in some prostate cancer patients. I considered it in 2020 when I was originally diagnosed and my insurance wouldn’t cover the procedure. As with any other treatment, careful monitoring of PSA post treatment is critical to detect Biochemical Recurrence before it becomes a serious issue.

I received focal treatment in the form of low dose brachytherapy. My peak PSA was about 7.0 prior to treatment. I was sold on the premise that I’d be cured without risking incontinance or ED. The doctor had no established post treatment guidelines for PSA levels. As a result I was blindsided when after a steady then rapid rise is PSA I was diagnosed with Stage 4 Gleason 9 PCa. I hope that patients receiving treatment with Nanoknife have a care team that avoids the same as I had.

Here’s a link to reasonably recent published study on Nanoknife: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/12/2178

Good luck to you on your journey.

Jump to this post

But brachytherapy is not new, right? Been around for decades and pretty successful for a time until Cyberknife snd Robotics came to the fore. My RO’s even discussed it with me as a first line treatment 5 yrs ago since it had made a comeback with some new isotope or something.
So was the ‘low dose’ the new fangled part of the equation? That could certainly be responsible for the seeds not being strong enough to kill all the cancer. Sorry you went thru all that for nothing, but monitoring saved the day as it does with us all…

REPLY
@cancerfreekevin

Sorry you've joined the club! I am now 29 months post Radical Prostatectomy and just like you I was Gleason 3+4. I took the time to self-advocate(ie the CEO of my journey) over a few months of meeting with various surgeons, specialists and talking to those who've been through the various procedures. I met with Dr Leonard Marks and his impressive team out at UCLA twice. BUT mostly I drilled down deep into the various studies and statistics to filter the noise within the medical community and come to a well-reasoned and quantifiable decision. Radical Prostatectomy offered the best statistical outcome to remain on this side of the dirt over the short and long term. At 28 months my PSA levels remain at zero and I am happy with my outcome. GOOD LUCK!

Jump to this post

Yes but am following similar approach to reach to conclusion of the treatment option.
Have you encountered any incontinence issues with urine? This is one on my concern if I choose RALP surgery.
Even in current state I do have strong urge to go to bathroom and get few leaks if I hold long

REPLY
@jeffmarc

if you were a patient with San Francisco’s University of California prostate cancer group they would probably recommend radiation with a 3+4 Gleason . Have you considered getting an outside opinion?

Mark C. Scholz, MD, serves as medical director of Prostate Oncology Specialists Inc. in Marina del Rey, CA, He is one of the top people in the country for treating people with prostate cancer. He would be a great source for a second opinion.

If you want to check up on him go to YouTube and look up the PCRI conferences. He always gives some really good talks about treatment.

Surgery frequently causes you to lose the ability to have an erection. With radiation you don’t normally have that issue. With a Trimix injection you can probably work around that even if you have surgery.

Radiation has replaced surgery for most people these days. You should look into the other option.

Jump to this post

FYI- I(age 61) am 29 months post Radical Prostatectomy and have regained my erection. I had it immediately after the catheter was removed, it then mostly went away roughly 3 months post op, so I used Trimix (for re-training purposes LOL) off and on for 6 months until Jan of '23. As of now I do not use any ED drugs.

REPLY
@manojsmishra

Yes but am following similar approach to reach to conclusion of the treatment option.
Have you encountered any incontinence issues with urine? This is one on my concern if I choose RALP surgery.
Even in current state I do have strong urge to go to bathroom and get few leaks if I hold long

Jump to this post

I was in Depends for about 6 weeks post op with a progression of less frequent need to change to a dry Depend as the days progressed. The frequent retraining exercises help the progress. That said, my urine stream is slower than pre-surgery, there is a rare drip(passing gas can cause this) and with caffeine and heavy hydration my ability to put off urination has been lessened. BUT call this a rationale as most of my peers(I'm 61) seem to have similar issues with their relatively healthy prostate these days.

REPLY
@cancerfreekevin

I was in Depends for about 6 weeks post op with a progression of less frequent need to change to a dry Depend as the days progressed. The frequent retraining exercises help the progress. That said, my urine stream is slower than pre-surgery, there is a rare drip(passing gas can cause this) and with caffeine and heavy hydration my ability to put off urination has been lessened. BUT call this a rationale as most of my peers(I'm 61) seem to have similar issues with their relatively healthy prostate these days.

Jump to this post

Any issues to expected with catheter? That is appearing to me the worst part of the procedure

REPLY
@manojsmishra

Any issues to expected with catheter? That is appearing to me the worst part of the procedure

Jump to this post

The catheter is more mental gymnastics than anything else. The day mine was removed, eight days post op, I told the nurse who was removing it that friends of mine around the country think they'll be able to hear me scream when she removed it. We laughed, she yanked it out and that was it.

Very minor discomfort and that was it.

REPLY
@cancerfreekevin

The catheter is more mental gymnastics than anything else. The day mine was removed, eight days post op, I told the nurse who was removing it that friends of mine around the country think they'll be able to hear me scream when she removed it. We laughed, she yanked it out and that was it.

Very minor discomfort and that was it.

Jump to this post

How painful is the recovery from incisions? Specially the large one?
Shoulder pain post procedure?

REPLY

I'll confirm that a catheter was surprisingly no big deal pain wise, at least not for me. We're a little nervous about anything going on down there, and tend to overestimate the pain.

On the other hand, a suction tube being pushed down through my nose into my stomach is the worst pain I've ever experienced, and it took them three tries (the first two hit my lungs). I have a high pain tolerance, but I needed half the nurses on the floor and my spouse holding and calming me to get that into my stomach (you have to be awake and swallowing rapidly, with no anaesthetic, to help guide it the right way).

YMMV

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.