Gleason7(3+4) - treatment options recommendation

Posted by manojsmishra @manojsmishra, Aug 25 3:42pm

Got recently diagnosed with Gleason group 2, 7(3+4). Was in state of shock to know about the cancer.
I’m 56 year old and fortunately I’m with Mayo care since last decade.
Recommendation for me is to have prostatectomy as radiation therapy has long term implications. Took outside opinion also and same recommendation. But not sure how to deal post procedure with urge to urinate situation currently there.
Biggest thing is I’m hoping there is no recurrence occurring after this. Any suggestion/recommendation?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@jc76

@manojsmishra
There is a difference between photon and proton. You are right the new photon radiation treatments have improved drastically over the years to control the beam more prescisely.

However the difference is that photon radiation continues through body. Proton radiation does not. Proton radiation can be stopped at a precise point and not have the radiation continue. Thus using the margins set by R/O the proton beam stops at that precise location and does not continue through body.

Thus the benefit is not in treatment outcomes (both are equal) but the prospects of reducing damage done by photon radiation continuing through body. This is the benefit identified by proton centers. It is why I mentioned proton is used a lot in children, eye cancers, throat , etc. Mayo Jacksoville does referrals to UFHPTI for specific cancers especially in children where they are really trying to reduce the amount of radiation to other organs and tissues.

Mayo Jacksonville does not have proton radiation. They are building a new cancer facility and it will have proton radiation.

My information on proton and photon comes from WEB MD, Mayo, Cleveland Clinic, american cancer society, my PCP at Mayo Jacksonville, my R/O at Mayo Jacksonville and my R/O at UFHPTI.

UFHPTI will send you a booklet regarding proton radiation and all the research it that has been done on photon and proton. The booklet is outstanding in clarifying differences and the specifics of what UFHPTI does as a treatment facility. UFHPTI got a 25 million dollar federal grant to do on going research in radiation treatments with photon and proton. I volunteered to be in their research program.

Mayo R/O and UFHPTI stated same as your R/O the cancer success and outcome of treatments by photon or proton is equal. Thus that is why they say no additional benefit. The benefit is that proton does not pass through body thus affecting the organs, tissues, beyond prostrate. With many advances in photon radiation techniques there is more and more success in photon reduction in damage to surrounding organs and tissues. So the photon radiation is drastically improving.

My R/O as UFHPTI when I first got my second opinion said he wanted to emphasize two things. One, that they are state salaried employees and do not receive any benefit from adding tests. He will only order what he thinks I need to succeed in treatment Second, the only difference in the NEW photon radiation treatments and proton radiation is the benefit that the proton radiation stops at the precise location the R/O has set and does not continue through body like photon. The outcomes of cancer treatment success are the same.

I had what they call pencil beam proton radiation with the markers and Space/Or. My PCP when I told him I was going with proton (He advised me to get two separate opinons) that he believes my decision was good based on my specific case. My PCP stated the patient must decide and choose what they feel is best for them after consultations and research.
Good Luck!!!!

Jump to this post

I suspect a (marginal) benefit of photon over proton would be that if the cancer has spread a bit more than detected, the radiation spreads a bit more too, and might just attack it anyway.

For most people, though, I agree that proton would be more desirable if available, especially for cancer that's in a very early stage and clearly isolated in one or two spots in the prostate. Radiation cystitis (bladder damage) and proctitis (rectal damage) — even when extremely mild, like mine — are annoying, though you learn to live with them.

Still, even if it had been available, I probably wouldn't have gone for proton in my case, because my cancer had already spread non-locally to my spine, so there was a non-trivial chance there might be some hanging around near the prostate as well that didn't show up in the scans. They told me that even though it's fairly precise, the SBRT (CyberKnife) photon radiation I received continues working and spreading for quite a few weeks after treatments end.

REPLY

Because of the fact that you are a Gleason 9 I think it would benefit you greatly if you attend Ancan webinars. They are held once a week and people who are new get priority and can get recommendations for treatment from doctors and lay people with a lot of experience.

Go to Ancan.org and sign up for the advanced prostate cancer group. You can actually watch their past webinars on YouTube and you will immediately find out that the information you will get there exceeds what you’re getting now. You can speed up the playback to up to double normal time.

The next meeting is Tuesday at 3 PM Pacific time. They are two hour meetings. The following Monday the meeting is at 5 PM Pacific time. You need to install. GoTo Meeting to attend, not zoom. They also have phone in capability if you would prefer.

REPLY
@northoftheborder

I suspect a (marginal) benefit of photon over proton would be that if the cancer has spread a bit more than detected, the radiation spreads a bit more too, and might just attack it anyway.

For most people, though, I agree that proton would be more desirable if available, especially for cancer that's in a very early stage and clearly isolated in one or two spots in the prostate. Radiation cystitis (bladder damage) and proctitis (rectal damage) — even when extremely mild, like mine — are annoying, though you learn to live with them.

Still, even if it had been available, I probably wouldn't have gone for proton in my case, because my cancer had already spread non-locally to my spine, so there was a non-trivial chance there might be some hanging around near the prostate as well that didn't show up in the scans. They told me that even though it's fairly precise, the SBRT (CyberKnife) photon radiation I received continues working and spreading for quite a few weeks after treatments end.

Jump to this post

@northoftheborder
When I had my consultations with Mayo R/O and UFHPTI R/O both said they treatment I would receive would be to entire prostrate and margins.

Why I asked? Answer there is NO guarantee that the biopsies taken show all areas that can have cancer. If we miss an area, even minute the cancer will still grow and could spread. So both radiate all the prostrate AND margins outside the prostrate.

With your case yes if outside the prostrate a very different situation. Mine was confirmed inside prostrate from the PSMA and bone scans. It was determined I was in the very early stages of the cancer and Decipher came back low risk. But they still did margins.

Yes the damage to prostrate by either contiues for several weeks. I had to wait 4 weeks until could take supplements again. There are some new radiation treatments actual designed to kill the cancer but my concern with that unless you treat all you can miss a cell here or there. Most photon and proton radiation is designed to damage the cancer cells. When damaged the cancer cells cannot reproduce and eventually die. The radiation also damages the regular prostrate cells but they can reproduce and heal themselves.

It is why I was taken of all supplements that are designed to protect cells and antioxidants. I was adivsed research has shown those supplements help protect the cells but they also protect the cancer cells.

REPLY
@jc76

@northoftheborder
When I had my consultations with Mayo R/O and UFHPTI R/O both said they treatment I would receive would be to entire prostrate and margins.

Why I asked? Answer there is NO guarantee that the biopsies taken show all areas that can have cancer. If we miss an area, even minute the cancer will still grow and could spread. So both radiate all the prostrate AND margins outside the prostrate.

With your case yes if outside the prostrate a very different situation. Mine was confirmed inside prostrate from the PSMA and bone scans. It was determined I was in the very early stages of the cancer and Decipher came back low risk. But they still did margins.

Yes the damage to prostrate by either contiues for several weeks. I had to wait 4 weeks until could take supplements again. There are some new radiation treatments actual designed to kill the cancer but my concern with that unless you treat all you can miss a cell here or there. Most photon and proton radiation is designed to damage the cancer cells. When damaged the cancer cells cannot reproduce and eventually die. The radiation also damages the regular prostrate cells but they can reproduce and heal themselves.

It is why I was taken of all supplements that are designed to protect cells and antioxidants. I was adivsed research has shown those supplements help protect the cells but they also protect the cancer cells.

Jump to this post

That makes a lot of sense. Like you, I was happy to risk some mild irritation in the areas surrounding my prostate, like the bladder and rectum in return for having a better chance of capturing any stray cancer cells.

One thing I'm curious about: after SBRT (photon beam), I was told I can never go shirtless outside again during the day because my skin (at both radiation sites) will be ultra-sensitive to U/V.

Does the same apply to proton-beam radiation, or is the skin unaffected because the radiation beam delivers its highest load internally rather than at the surface?

REPLY

Have you investigated any of the Monotherapy Treatments ( no ADT Shit ) ?
Ask your Radiation Oncologist about SBRT - 5 Treatments Mon-Wed-Fri and Mon - Wed the following week or HDR Brachytherapy ( Monotherapy . 2 doses 2 weeks apart or sometimes only 1 dose .

REPLY

I have same Gleason score as you. I’m 59. My urologist here in SF is recommending prostatectomy also. Got a second opinion from Dr. Humphrey at Mayo in Scottsdale and he concurred. Have two more appointments one with oncologist and another with a HIFU specialist (high intensity focused ultrasound). I’ll decide by end of month. Hope all goes well for you. For me it’s been helpful just participating in communities like this for support. It’s not fun to get this diagnosis but I keep telling myself it’s better than the alternative.

REPLY
@northoftheborder

That makes a lot of sense. Like you, I was happy to risk some mild irritation in the areas surrounding my prostate, like the bladder and rectum in return for having a better chance of capturing any stray cancer cells.

One thing I'm curious about: after SBRT (photon beam), I was told I can never go shirtless outside again during the day because my skin (at both radiation sites) will be ultra-sensitive to U/V.

Does the same apply to proton-beam radiation, or is the skin unaffected because the radiation beam delivers its highest load internally rather than at the surface?

Jump to this post

@northoftheborder (how is Canada these days)
Never heard of the photo (SBRT) causing the inability to ever take shirt off. But I am not as familiar with photon as I am with proton. Did the photon radiation subject your entire chest area to significant radiation?

It would make sense if it had because photon radiation burn on skin is like a bad repeated sun burn so could make it sensitive to sun burns. But why so much in chest area and not just around entry sites.

I had pencil beam proton. It is a very precise beam and depth of release radiation. My areas of skin tanning were on the top of each side of hips but only a couple of inches. I have a ICD/Pacemaker and UFHPTI physics department recommend the pencil beam proton for me to keep radiation away from my ICD/pacemaker.

You are right on proton. R/O expalined the intensity of proton radiation going in is very much lower than the intensity of the radiation at the programmed release depth.

My R/Os explained (like yours did) why they don't just radiate biopsied areas, or MRI areas, as take a chance of a cancer cells being missed in prostrate or in the margins ouside the prostrate.

I worry sometimes when I read radiation treatments directly targeting the MRI confirmed cancer areas only or biopsied confirmed cancer areas only. You would think this would increase the chances of missing cancer cells.

REPLY
@jc76

@northoftheborder (how is Canada these days)
Never heard of the photo (SBRT) causing the inability to ever take shirt off. But I am not as familiar with photon as I am with proton. Did the photon radiation subject your entire chest area to significant radiation?

It would make sense if it had because photon radiation burn on skin is like a bad repeated sun burn so could make it sensitive to sun burns. But why so much in chest area and not just around entry sites.

I had pencil beam proton. It is a very precise beam and depth of release radiation. My areas of skin tanning were on the top of each side of hips but only a couple of inches. I have a ICD/Pacemaker and UFHPTI physics department recommend the pencil beam proton for me to keep radiation away from my ICD/pacemaker.

You are right on proton. R/O expalined the intensity of proton radiation going in is very much lower than the intensity of the radiation at the programmed release depth.

My R/Os explained (like yours did) why they don't just radiate biopsied areas, or MRI areas, as take a chance of a cancer cells being missed in prostrate or in the margins ouside the prostrate.

I worry sometimes when I read radiation treatments directly targeting the MRI confirmed cancer areas only or biopsied confirmed cancer areas only. You would think this would increase the chances of missing cancer cells.

Jump to this post

There's no visible skin damage, but the SBRT machine circles around delivering radiation to the same place from different angles and directions, so I have two sensitised areas: one around my middle chest (from the radiation to the metastasis/surgery site) and one around my lower abdomen/groun (from the radiation to my prostate).

REPLY

@northoftheborder
I was briefed on the SBRT moving around and directed radiation from different angles into body.

With the proton radiation they do a low dose xray to see your markers and prostrate and then make any adjustments before treatments. The 1st treatment comes from a specific entry poin on one side first. The beam is moving over the programmed area. Then the entire machine beam shuts down and moves over you to the other side of your body. You then get another low dose xray to line up your markers and prostrate and they make any adjustments before you get your treatment from that side.

This keeps the amount of radiation you get minimal to the specific areas of treatment both entry and directed areas. As you know proton radiation when it enters is low and the full energy is released only at a specific programmed depth and does NOT proceed out body.

When I first went for treatment I had a gantry that did not move over you but the entire bed you were laying on would turn 180 degrees. Really unique to be moved around automatically. But them I moved to a gantry that moves over you and was much faster.

I can see from your description you were getting far more radiation coming from many different and angles than proton beam radiation requires. But yours unlike mine was treating more areas than just the prostrate and margins. The middle chest you mentioned would confirm getting radiaton in chest areas and their concern for sun radiation to those areas of the skin.

REPLY
@pepesal

I have same Gleason score as you. I’m 59. My urologist here in SF is recommending prostatectomy also. Got a second opinion from Dr. Humphrey at Mayo in Scottsdale and he concurred. Have two more appointments one with oncologist and another with a HIFU specialist (high intensity focused ultrasound). I’ll decide by end of month. Hope all goes well for you. For me it’s been helpful just participating in communities like this for support. It’s not fun to get this diagnosis but I keep telling myself it’s better than the alternative.

Jump to this post

Have you investigated NanoKnife . It's being used worldwide and is preferred in many cases to HIFU .
If you consult with a "Surgeon ",as the name implies they want to operate and remove -- NOT TREAT . Focal Therapy is a bad word for them .

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.