Some supplements not really needed?
I take a supplement that has calcium, D3, and K2-MK4. I'm on board with these. The supplement also has C, magnesium, boron, copper, and manganese. None are in excessive quantity, but I wonder if it's a waste. I'm pretty sure I get these through my diet. I'd like to simplify what I'm taking if possible . I'm not a vegan. Are all these additional items really needed by most people in supplement form? I'm thinking that maybe just the magnesium is useful to supplement.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.
I also was consuming beans as a source of protein but doctor explained there are problems with beans. Can't seem to win.
I found an interesting interview Margaret Martin did with Dr. Tod Cooperman the founder of Consumer Lab. Toward the end they speak more generally about supplements and he confesses that he rarely uses any at all. It was taped 5 years ago.
yes, he's very conservative in his use. He sees the research up close and it often does not bear out health benefits and sometimes the opposite, risks. In addition, some supplements do not always contain what they state on the label, also regularly revealed in Consumer Lab's own lab testing of individual products. It's quite eye-opening.
I am so glad to read this as I refuse to become a pill junkie, especially when it comes to supplements. I limit myself to 5 individual pills a day and that includes prescription medication. My life is not going to revolve around taking supplements on some complicated schedule. Now if it comes to life-saving drugs, I will adjust accordingly.
I'm confused by this statement as beans are actually a good source of calcium. The only true negative I can find is they can cause gastrointestinal issues, but I think we already know that.