← Return to Annual Reclast delayed 3 weeks; is this a problem?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@gently

debbied28, the benefit from the first injection will extend for over three years. The physician who ran the clinical trials almost never repeats the injection at one year but waits for two because the effects are equal.
It's a safe bet that the delay will be inconsequential either in the interum or in the effectiveness.
The percentage change in lumbar bmd after a year of cessation from Reclast is a net positive.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519894/

Jump to this post


Replies to "debbied28, the benefit from the first injection will extend for over three years. The physician who..."

I thought this infusion was annually unless it needed to be performed sooner. Is that not correct?