← Return to 1.3 rise in yearly PSA and BRCA2 Positive

Discussion

1.3 rise in yearly PSA and BRCA2 Positive

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Aug 18 1:12pm | Replies (6)

Comment receiving replies
@cudabinacontenda

I’m sad to hear that a sibling of yours died so young from such a terrible disease. I’m also sorry to learn that you’re dealing with the uncertainty of such a mutation.

My understanding is that an MRI won’t rule out cancer. It’s more of a stepping stone to figuring out an approach to biopsy which, although not 100% accurate, is much more effective than scans in identifying malignancies. So if one gets an MRi, one is almost always headed for biopsy.

I also understand that 66 to 75 percent of PSA spikes are ultimately due to benign causes. (Anyone, please correct me if I am wrong on this.) So reducing unnecessary prostate scans and biopsies has long been the focus of urology. This means living with some short-term uncertainty in order to protect oneself from the potential complications of aggressive testing. So I’m willing to do this for a while with an appreciation of the risk.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I’m sad to hear that a sibling of yours died so young from such a terrible..."

Thank you for your kind thoughts.

An article I found online suggested PC screening protocols and PC treatment methods for BRCA positive patients. Looks like BRCA2 is particularly aggressive. I am unable to post links as of now. Only posting this information, as it may help someone else in a similar situation.

Google search terms

BRCA2 prostate clinical management