Mixed results 1 year after Forteo: What are your thoughts?

Posted by mayblin @mayblin, Nov 26, 2023

Hello all,

Recently I've pondering with my dexa results 1 year post Forteo treatment. There are so many involved factors which made it hard to pinpoint whats the main culprit for the negative part of the results.

Background and/Hx: 61yo diagnosed with op summer of 2022, no known fractures. No prior treatment of op including HRT. Started Forteo Sept. 2022. Comorbidities include mild cvd with hyperlipidemia which is controlled with a small dose of crestor; asymptomatic mild GERD w/o treatment and borderline pre-diabetic managed via lifestyle and diet.

At 13 mo post Forteo, Dexa results after vs before treatment are as follows:
L1-L4 spine: avg Tscore -3.1 vs -3.4, with a 4.9% bmd improvement. Each sub level also shows improvements;
Hip: avg Tscore -2.2 vs -1.8, with a -7.6% bmd decreasing!
TBS L1-L4: 1.318 vs 1.264, a 4.3% improvement.
P1NP is elevated in 400+

While I'm very happy with the spine and TBS improvements, the results for the hip/femoral region is very alarming, to say the least.

Has anyone of you experienced or heard of such discrepancy in results that Forteo would produce?

My immediate instinct is that I didn't exercise enough. I was only doing weigh/strength training with free weights consistently, targeting upper, lower and core, 15-20 reps x3-4, twice per week; with some walking and wearing weighted vest/backpack. Never thought about loading hip bones (but, I do quite a bit squats). After some reading I realized maybe I also need to increase amount of quality protein a bit. What's a good protein intake per kg body weight per day, in your opinion?

Anyhow, juggling among drug treatment choices as well as optimal nutrition, supplements and exercise is not an easy task.

Any opinions and suggestions are truly appreciated. The collective experiences and knowledge from patients are powerful!

UPDATE: March 30, 2024

My dexa scan 13 months post forteo therapy was reevaluated later and was found there were technical errors involved. My endo concluded that my femur neck and hip at both sides didn't have any significant change afterall. This is a good news to me. Although I wish I had some positive improvements at femur necks and hips, the results are within expectations. Thanks a lot to those who read my story. mayblin

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

@awfultruth

@loriesco not to worry. Your P1NP numbers look good to me. Others will probably comment who have more experience with following the bone markers along with their meds but from my limited experience and studying this, yours are fine. The starting number of 49 is a mid-range number for how much bone building your body is doing without an anabolic med. The 90 reading is a good step up indicating your body is responding to the Tymlos by creating more bone.
OTH if your initial reading was 90 that might be a bit worrisome as an indication that your body without meds is trying to build a lot of bone and probably is also "cleaning up" a lot of bone. I do not know how taking Reclast might have effected your baseline P1NP but generally your numbers indicate bone building was normal range before and now it's kicked into high gear which is what you want.
You did not mention your CTX score which indicating bone breakdown is used along side the P1NP to get a view of the balance between building up and tearing down. If you have your CTX scores that might help clarify things further.

Jump to this post

here's another confusing article! here - correct me if I am incorrect it says that the P1NP numbers should be reduced, not increased! Ugh... I'm so confused! @awfultruth , @mayblin, @gently and @windyshores https://news.mayocliniclabs.com/2023/08/07/laboratory-testing-of-bone-turnover-markers/#:~:text=Bone%20turnover%20markers%20(BTM)&text=The%20most%20common%20bone%20resorption,measurable%20in%20urine%20and%20serum.

REPLY
@windyshores

@loriesco you are fortunate to do these tests during the time when Tymlos is active! From what I have read ("Great Bones") a rise in P1NP means Tymlos is working well but check with a doc.

We look forward to hearing your DEXA results! Are you tolerating the Tymlos well now? Fingers crossed for you!

ps I had bone markers at 18 months which were pretty useless 🙂 The P1NP then showed Tymlos wasn't doing much anymore but I stayed on for maintenance while deciding next steps. DEXA at 18 months showed 20% gain in spine and 9% gain in hip.

Jump to this post

my endocrinologist is not in favor of these test @windyshores. I've come across info which might explain his ambivalence... they shouldn't be used to determine osteoporosis. However, they are good guides to effect treatment of the medications! On the other hand, he wants DEXAs. So that is next month with the software analysis.
YES - now, I seem to not have any side effects! I might be tired - I seem to take naps but maybe I'm just getting older. I don't know. My belly distension went away when I stopped injecting in the belly after about 2 - 3 weeks and I ordered the 32 x 4mm ultra fine nano injection tips. They work amazingly well. My legs were bruising with the others. I can see why the P1NP would be ineffective after stopping use of the medication. it really should be a marker of medication "ramping up" to effect a change of increased bone building/mass. I am still very confused about the word "remodeling." I would use it to describe BUILDING but I think its used to explain undesirable deterioration. For the life of me I can't read the literature and retain it. Congrats on your DEXAs! That's the important thing. They can't do my lumber or my hips. So they use the wrist which is not really helpful. So, I'll be eager to see what they come up with. I've heard some say they CAN use the lumbar regions around where I've had surgery... so we'll see!

REPLY

@gently Wow that hits the nail on the head with just the title "Effects of Yearly Zoledronic Acid 5 mg on Bone Turnover Markers and Relation of PINP With Fracture Reduction in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis ". Thanks, I'll have a look

REPLY
@awfultruth

@gently Wow that hits the nail on the head with just the title "Effects of Yearly Zoledronic Acid 5 mg on Bone Turnover Markers and Relation of PINP With Fracture Reduction in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis ". Thanks, I'll have a look

Jump to this post

I lost my post @loriesco so we are crossposting! The link you posted is about bisphosphonates, which have the opposite effect on CTX and P1NP vs Forteo and Tymlos, I believe. I forget, do you have McCormick's "Great Bones" or have you watched Dr. Ben Leder's youTube video "Combining and Sequencing Approaches to Osteoporosis?" My understanding is that your increase in P1NP is excellent, but confirm with your doctor. (Evenity raises it dramatically in the first month and then it declines quickly).

Let us know your DEXA. How many months will you have been on Tymlos when you have it?
Fingers crossed!

REPLY
@bboon55

For those who are lactose intolerant, as I once considered myself, there is new data about how some people are actually reacting to the A1 casein protein in dairy. The cows in some parts of the world produce milk that has the A2 casein protein (notably Guernsey and Jersey cows) and it is easier to digest and causes much less inflammation and digestive side effects. Below is a link from pubmed (hope it works) with a typical article explaining:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26404362/. The title of the study is 'Milk Intolerance, Beta-casein and Lactose.'

I first learned of this from a Korean friend whose son went on vacation in Europe. He came home marveling about how he could drink the milk in Europe without problems, and she looked into it (we're physicians who attended medical school together).

Sure enough, when I went to the grocery store and bought A2 milk (the packaging will have that prominently), I was able to drink it without any problems. It opened up another way to get calcium that I thought was closed to me.

Jump to this post

OMG - great share! totally explains why I can digest sheep/goat feta (mostly considered mediterranean) but can't digest cow feta!!! EVEN when the cow feta is "lactose free!" I never thought I had a casein intolerance but know I have lactose intolerance because I inherited THE gene mutation from both parents. Really great to know what I couldn't figure out!
I'd buy the feta at the middle east market. then one day I bought it at a big chain grocery. It said lactose free so I didn't think anything of it. Got the WORST cramping. Since then I stay away from American made cow feta (which Americans love to produce). I always knew that lactose was different from casein. I can eat very aged cheeses with zero problems - even if the cheese is from cows - I even buy cheese and keep it in the deli drawer for a year before eating. Never have a problem. But had problems with the cow feta! Now I just buy sheep and goat cheeses intuitively. Thank you @bboon55 !
"Sheep's milk contains A2 beta-casein, a type of casein protein that is easier to digest than the A1 beta-casein found in cow's milk. A2 beta-casein is also less inflammatory and closer to the proteins found in human breast milk, making it less likely to trigger allergies. Because of this, some say that sheep's milk is healthier than cow's milk and can be a good dairy alternative for people with sensitive stomachs.
Goat milk primarily contains A2 casein proteins, which are a type of beta-casein found in milk protein. In contrast, cow milk typically contains A1 casein proteins, though some cows do produce A2 milk. Goat milk's higher proportion of A2 casein compared to cow milk can affect the bioactive peptides that are hydrolyzed in the milk. "

REPLY
@windyshores

I lost my post @loriesco so we are crossposting! The link you posted is about bisphosphonates, which have the opposite effect on CTX and P1NP vs Forteo and Tymlos, I believe. I forget, do you have McCormick's "Great Bones" or have you watched Dr. Ben Leder's youTube video "Combining and Sequencing Approaches to Osteoporosis?" My understanding is that your increase in P1NP is excellent, but confirm with your doctor. (Evenity raises it dramatically in the first month and then it declines quickly).

Let us know your DEXA. How many months will you have been on Tymlos when you have it?
Fingers crossed!

Jump to this post

okay YES - NOW I get it! I couldn't make sense of this. I told the dentist TYMLOS is NOT a biphosphonate yesterday. I don't think she believed me. 😉 She was worried about my tooth extraction and getting more wisdom teeth pulled if I needed it. I told her not to worry! I'll make a note and try to watch what you suggest. I'm getting busy with November's election stuff and I gave myself a concussion two weeks ago - so I'm dealing with PT now. Ugh. I'm getting better except for the neck whiplash. When I do something I do it right! thank you for having my back! 😉 god forbid my endo dr. might respond....

REPLY
@loriesco

thank you that is wonderful news. The CTX , along with the first P1NP of 49, was 322. Here's another mixed misunderstanding for me. Google says: "Beta-crosslaps test results are normal when less than 300 pg/ml. Above 300 pg/ml indicates increased bone resorption. In this case, the patient may have osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism."
So - do you understand why I am frustrated and anxious? My score is higher than 300, but that is supposed to be GOOD in the first part of the quote. Then, (like the P1NP) it goes on to say that it means negative stuff - osteoporosis and disease. Why can't people write in simple language. It should be qualified with "if you are on bone stimulating medications the response should be taken as an indicator that medicines are positively working in comparison to those who AREN'T taking them, which indicates an underlying concern.
Shouldn't I have had a second CTX at 3 months like the P1NP?!
The Reclast was done Aug. 2024. The Tymlos started mid March but I had such bad reactions I skipped the following month. The P1NP/CTX mid June and now the P1NP. Let me know if I should ask for a CTX to compare? thank you!!!

Jump to this post

@loriesco I'm afraid I don't understand your first confusion. "Beta-crosslaps test results are normal when less than 300 pg/ml. Above 300 pg/ml indicates increased bone resorption. In this case, the patient may have osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism."
So if yours is 322 then it is outside of the most desired range and maybe indicates too much bone resorption (bone tearing down). So I read it as not great all the way thru.

Remember that with bone markers and with DXA scores it's best to observe trends. Ranges are of course important but following trends helps you to know whether results are likely accurate and how you are responding to whatever you are trying to do to help.

If your CTX of 322 was one year after a Reclast infusion you might guess that you need another infusion (or a different treatment). But what would be ideal would be to have CTX scores at baseline with Reclast and then at intervals. That way you could consider another infusion when you need it rather than when some abstract one size fits all schedule. I'm not suggesting you invest in time travel and redo all this, just pointing it out to help going forward. Though I do wish time travel was an option here.

Here's some notes I took from Lani Simpson that give an idea of this: "For Reclast judge when to repeat by ctx. If around 200 do not repeat, at 250 or 275 maybe repeat. "
This is assuming that it went down lower than 250 or so after the previous Reclast shot.
BTW some folks keep low CTX scores for 2 years or more and would quite likely not need another Reclast infusion until the CTX did rise to those levels.
I know you are past Reclast and into Evenity - I'm just putting this in to show how we all need to think about this (since many of our doctors are not thinking like this).

For P1NP my doc was delighted that my score nearly doubled from baseline to one month after my first Evenity shots. Unfortunately I don't have other markers and I'm almost done with Evenity. I'm getting my DXA two months early in order to help me figure out what to do next. Have to pay for it myself but it's no easy matter if you wait until 30 days after your last Evenity shot to get a DXA and then you have to immediately decide what to do next and get the doc to agree, and get it approved with insurance and get all the paperwork done etc. So I'm going to pay and hopefully have a smoother transition to the next med. It took me 5 months to get Evenity from the time I got the doc to agree to it. Hopefully I will have made good gains.

REPLY
@awfultruth

@loriesco I'm afraid I don't understand your first confusion. "Beta-crosslaps test results are normal when less than 300 pg/ml. Above 300 pg/ml indicates increased bone resorption. In this case, the patient may have osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism."
So if yours is 322 then it is outside of the most desired range and maybe indicates too much bone resorption (bone tearing down). So I read it as not great all the way thru.

Remember that with bone markers and with DXA scores it's best to observe trends. Ranges are of course important but following trends helps you to know whether results are likely accurate and how you are responding to whatever you are trying to do to help.

If your CTX of 322 was one year after a Reclast infusion you might guess that you need another infusion (or a different treatment). But what would be ideal would be to have CTX scores at baseline with Reclast and then at intervals. That way you could consider another infusion when you need it rather than when some abstract one size fits all schedule. I'm not suggesting you invest in time travel and redo all this, just pointing it out to help going forward. Though I do wish time travel was an option here.

Here's some notes I took from Lani Simpson that give an idea of this: "For Reclast judge when to repeat by ctx. If around 200 do not repeat, at 250 or 275 maybe repeat. "
This is assuming that it went down lower than 250 or so after the previous Reclast shot.
BTW some folks keep low CTX scores for 2 years or more and would quite likely not need another Reclast infusion until the CTX did rise to those levels.
I know you are past Reclast and into Evenity - I'm just putting this in to show how we all need to think about this (since many of our doctors are not thinking like this).

For P1NP my doc was delighted that my score nearly doubled from baseline to one month after my first Evenity shots. Unfortunately I don't have other markers and I'm almost done with Evenity. I'm getting my DXA two months early in order to help me figure out what to do next. Have to pay for it myself but it's no easy matter if you wait until 30 days after your last Evenity shot to get a DXA and then you have to immediately decide what to do next and get the doc to agree, and get it approved with insurance and get all the paperwork done etc. So I'm going to pay and hopefully have a smoother transition to the next med. It took me 5 months to get Evenity from the time I got the doc to agree to it. Hopefully I will have made good gains.

Jump to this post

the way it was explained to me just now by @windyshores - was TYMLOS, because it is not a biphosphonate, has the opposite effect with the numbers. So the 49 to 90 was GOOD whereas if it was a biphosphonate it would be bad. And I guess my 322 over the 300 is also going in the correct direction. They have already told me I am not doing any reclast until I am off the Tymlos and then I do the reclast once a year for 3 years and then I'm done. (unless new research comes up). I can't do them together because it is not the protocol with the TYMLOS.
I just looked up Lani Simpson. I don't know about her but I am at UCSD a teaching hospital and they really know what they are doing there in the specialty departments. It was explained to me why I will be doing this as the protocol they are recommending. I am on board with it. I grill my endocrinologist and his assistants. Totally.
They work in a team - in a non profit - teaching other doctors to become tomorrow's doctors. I am on Medicare now (before I had military insurance) so I don't worry about the cost. I just make sure I get the BEST there is. I had to fight to get this protocol because its not the first line of medication. I also get to go to the head of the class as I am gluten and lactose-intolerant. (lactose and gluten-free meds are more expensive). Because of my many diagnoses I am always permitted (and willing) to get labs and tests if the doctor finds them helpful.

I have done the DEXAS for 15 years now but without the TBA software analysis - it is no longer helpful because they must test on my wrists. So I went back and forth and settled on UCSD to do the next DEXA. I just have to get in the back of the line is all. 😉

REPLY
@loriesco

okay YES - NOW I get it! I couldn't make sense of this. I told the dentist TYMLOS is NOT a biphosphonate yesterday. I don't think she believed me. 😉 She was worried about my tooth extraction and getting more wisdom teeth pulled if I needed it. I told her not to worry! I'll make a note and try to watch what you suggest. I'm getting busy with November's election stuff and I gave myself a concussion two weeks ago - so I'm dealing with PT now. Ugh. I'm getting better except for the neck whiplash. When I do something I do it right! thank you for having my back! 😉 god forbid my endo dr. might respond....

Jump to this post

Dentists seem to think all bone meds are a problem! Tymlos can help with fracture healing, so who knows maybe it helps with extraction-? I guess you can't ask your dentist 🙂

REPLY
@loriesco

the way it was explained to me just now by @windyshores - was TYMLOS, because it is not a biphosphonate, has the opposite effect with the numbers. So the 49 to 90 was GOOD whereas if it was a biphosphonate it would be bad. And I guess my 322 over the 300 is also going in the correct direction. They have already told me I am not doing any reclast until I am off the Tymlos and then I do the reclast once a year for 3 years and then I'm done. (unless new research comes up). I can't do them together because it is not the protocol with the TYMLOS.
I just looked up Lani Simpson. I don't know about her but I am at UCSD a teaching hospital and they really know what they are doing there in the specialty departments. It was explained to me why I will be doing this as the protocol they are recommending. I am on board with it. I grill my endocrinologist and his assistants. Totally.
They work in a team - in a non profit - teaching other doctors to become tomorrow's doctors. I am on Medicare now (before I had military insurance) so I don't worry about the cost. I just make sure I get the BEST there is. I had to fight to get this protocol because its not the first line of medication. I also get to go to the head of the class as I am gluten and lactose-intolerant. (lactose and gluten-free meds are more expensive). Because of my many diagnoses I am always permitted (and willing) to get labs and tests if the doctor finds them helpful.

I have done the DEXAS for 15 years now but without the TBA software analysis - it is no longer helpful because they must test on my wrists. So I went back and forth and settled on UCSD to do the next DEXA. I just have to get in the back of the line is all. 😉

Jump to this post

@loriesco the relationship between P1NP and CTX is complicated. I may not have this right (ask your doctor) but my memory from "Great Bones" and Leder's video is that ideally the two get "uncoupled." As I remember bisphosphonates make both go down and Forteo?Tymlos make both go up. The ideal apparently is to have P1NP go up and CTX go down and there is an ideal "window" for this. (I don't have my copy of "Great Bones" with me but Leder gives a really good explanation of this on YouTube- "Combining and Sequencing Approaches to Osteoporosis." )Leder discusses doing 0-9 months Forteo and with Prolia coinciding for months 3-15 to get this effect and also says that Evenity does the same thing, though the P1NP does go down quickly and it isn't as potent an antiresorptive. I get confused too about "remodeling"! (Of course Prolia would then pose the risk of rebound, which Leder also discusses...)

UCSD hospital is the best! My kid used that hospital and I had my first afib episode treated there. So much research is done in San Diego and they are very progressive in their care. Good luck!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.