← Return to Gleason 6 (3+3) treatments

Discussion

Gleason 6 (3+3) treatments

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Aug 18 3:46pm | Replies (111)

Comment receiving replies
@clandeboye1

Brian ,
I am familiar with these studies .
My point being , your Gleason score may be higher than your Biopsy report . If you are all 3+3=6 there may be some 4 in there which shines a different light on your treatment options . In such a case , I recommend a 2nd Biopsy opinion .
See Pages 112 & 113 of Dr. Walshs book " Biopsy - Why you should get a 2nd opinion "
Thanks for your response .

Jump to this post


Replies to "Brian , I am familiar with these studies . My point being , your Gleason score..."

As those studies show, pathological grade usually stays the same as needle-biopsy or is downgraded. Sometimes yes, it is upgraded. If there is concern of something more serious lurking unseen, there are no less than a half-dozen other non-intrusive tests and calculations that can be done to estimate this rather than getting a prostatectomy just to find out.

Yes, 2nd opinions can be valuable (I’ve had two). But, I fully understand that much of the interpretation of images, scans, and slides is often as much an art as it is a science and dependent on the skill and experience of whoever is doing the reading. It’s good to have an independent set of eyes reviewing images, scans, or biopsies. But even then, there is no guarantee that that’s what it really is. Such is life….