← Return to Low baseline testostrone and overall survival after treatment

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@gently

@cheriekhan ,
this is great. You are really doing the reasearch for him. The studies I've seen indicated that the testosterone has to be very, very low 2. 5ng/ml
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+low+does+testosterone+have+to+be+to+increase+the+incidence+of+prostate+cancer&oq=how+low+does+testosterone+have+to+be+to+increase+the+incidence+of+prostate+cancer&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTI4MjU4ajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
But find the charts associated with the information you've found. And clue us in.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@cheriekhan , this is great. You are really doing the reasearch for him. The studies I've..."

The peer reviewed studies with control groups with a sample of 2900 patients out there show otherwise especially when it comes to overall survival with multi intervention modalities. Observational studies show there is correlation. Which is why I am asking. But the levels at base line the were considered low prior to any treatment were under 220 T from what I read. But. then this article says 2.5 so I would love to be wrong in this case.