← Return to HRT Safety

Discussion

HRT Safety

Osteoporosis & Bone Health | Last Active: Jul 21 6:54am | Replies (80)

Comment receiving replies
@mayblin

Hi @debbie1956 thank you very much for posting this podcast link. It summarizes the current view/approaches well, especially for those of us who are 10 years past menopause. The “timing hypothesis” has been discussed here and there are published papers available on this topic.

Regarding cardiovascular risk related to HRT use, there is an article I came across by Cleveland Clinic worth reading:
https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/menopausal-hormone-therapy-and-heart-risk-updated-guidance-is-at-hand
In this article, the risks were stratified to 3 categories:

“In keeping with the guidelines from the four medical societies, the ACC committee advises cardiologists to take a risk-stratified approach to HT, as follows:

Treatment is low-risk in women with recent menopause, normal weight and normal blood pressure who are physically active and have a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk < 5% as well as a low risk for breast cancer.
Treatment is intermediate-risk in women who have one or more of several risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertension, obesity, sedentary lifestyle or limited mobility, autoimmune disease, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome) and those who have a 10-year ASCVD risk from 5% to 10% or are at high risk for breast cancer.
Treatment is high-risk in women who have congenital heart disease, ASCVD or coronary/peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism (VTE) or pulmonary embolism, stroke/transient ischemic attack or myocardial infarction, breast cancer or a 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 10%.”

The article also provided a link for an in depth review by Dr. Leslie Cho, a Cleveland clinic cardiologist.

I was under the care of my current cardiologist for 3 years then sought a second opinion of a cardiologist who specializes women’s heart recently. They both concluded that HRT is suitable for me as far as cvd risk is considered, even though I had a cac score of 38. I had numerous tests done and labs are followed closely for the past 3 years. The cardiology specialist wanted the target for my LDL-c below 55 and HbA1c below 5.6, a stricter target than the one I previously followed. Now looking at the stratified category, I realize I’m between low and intermediate risk. Maybe that’s why the specialist adjusted target bio parameters lower.

Hope this article is helpful to someone seeking cvd risk related information.

Wish you a smooth process going forward, and that HRT works for your needs!

Jump to this post


Replies to "Hi @debbie1956 thank you very much for posting this podcast link. It summarizes the current view/approaches..."

Great information from everyone. One question. Assuming a woman 15 yrs post menopause is in the low to intermediate risk category and goes on hrt. Is she on hormones for the rest of her life? or tested every year to determine when to come off? When she stops hrt does she go through the same symptoms as menopause?

yes, it is - thank you for sharing it. I might want to look at restarting bioidentical HRT but with what you just posted I see why the endocrine dr. didn't want to deal with it. I have such complicated cancer risk and familial cardiovascular risk -- the dance would be extraordinarily intensive to analyze the risk/reward....
better to check my astrology about it! haha.

@mayblin The Cleveland Clinic article was very helpful and much appreciated thank you. I found it reassuring and like that it goes into detail. I was very happy with the menopause practitioner I consulted last week who had an impressive knowledge of OP and HT. The Cleveland article substantiates her qualifications and information she provided. My cardiovascular and diabetic risk was the main focus of her risk assessment. It would appear I may be between a level 1 and 2 risk as well with a rare autoimmune condition (no symptoms now) I receive IVIG for. The LDL level of below 55 your cardiologist is aiming for seems below the Canadian lower reference range when I do the conversion. Perhaps I have the wrong formula. My numbers are all fine fortunately. How I wish I had started the HT 10 years ago, butI 'm hopeful the Estradiol patch and micronized progesterone I began yesterday will prevent further bone loss and preserve quality. No symptoms at all so far and I am extremely sensitive to medication. Are you presently on HT?

I wish you much success in your journey ahead as well!