← Return to Is there any legit, peer-reviewed, NIH studies about supplements
DiscussionIs there any legit, peer-reviewed, NIH studies about supplements
Post-COVID Recovery & COVID-19 | Last Active: Jun 11 7:22pm | Replies (7)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "As far as the NIH is concerned, I think pretty worthless with regard to long Covid...."
Covid and LC are new, meaning WTF what do we use as analogs. Research science is slow and methodical, organizing the study, collecting enough subjects/samples, analysis, and publication take years. That plus bureaucrats interfering with science are reasons why past advising people on masks/distance/closings/etc. was like tossing a lot of cats into a bag. Science will have answers for covid and long covid (LC), but it will take months and years. I am a research scientist, and got covid March 2023; my LC lasted for 8 months and is almost gone now. I just get some glimmerings of fatigue and don't have as much endurance as before; maybe some of that is turning 70 and having multiple autoimmune diseases. I managed LC by managing stress, sleeping, and exercise in bits followed by rest. I already had a constrained mostly FODMAP diet due to celiac. I've kept a food log for many years and didn't find any correlation between what I ate and how I felt, at least regarding LC. Were someone to have a food intolerance, LC would likely be harder because of a ramped up immune response. Celiac can be asymptomatic or have any of a couple of hundred symptoms when glutened; it is controlled by not eating wheat, rye, or barley. I suspect that LC will be as complex but hopefully more info on how to minimize or end it is in the pipe. Did I mention that research scientists tend to be verbose?