Has anyone dealt successfully with Cervical stenosis without surgery?
I am a healthy and active 32 year old male. Last month I was diagnosed with cervical stenosis (C5-C6) after having morning finger numbness for 2 months. All 3 doctors I asked suggest surgery, either disk replacement or merging of spines. Has anyone dealt successfully with such conditions via non surgical means? Thank you.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Spine Health Support Group.
Hi, @jenniferhunter! It's great to hear from you again. I've not made up my mind yet about a second opinion. I know it's the smart thing to do––and I may very well look for one. I must say the surgeon with whom I met––and not only the surgeon but also his nurse––provided an amazing experience. Friends had cautioned me: Be careful, Ray! If he's a surgeon, he's going to try to sell you on surgery! Thanks to my friends' cautions, I went fully prepared. But both the doctor and the nurse were so detailed in their presentations, so seemingly caring (great listeners!), so patient in going over the specifics of my situation (my symptoms, history, MRIs, and X-rays) that I drove home believing I couldn't possibly be in more caring, competent hands. I say all that, and yet I may still seek a second opinion. (In fact, the surgeon said he'd fully understand if I were to solicit a second opinion.) So, we'll see. One day at a time. This Tuesday I'll get those neck flexion X-rays and the thoracic MRI. Then, I see the surgeon next on 9/8. Between now and then, I'll continue with my cervical PT. I remain in good spirits about all this. I'm looking forward to getting the proper thing done––once I've determined the "proper thing"! Ha! Thank you for your continued interest. Your messages are a great comfort! Best wishes, Ray
@ray666 Detail is good. Other opinions are useful in a few ways. You may get several opinions in agreement of the need for surgery, and you would know that you are getting an honest evaluation. You may get wildly different opinions that place blame on other diseases instead of your spine, and you can tell if a surgeon is paying attention or trying to dismiss you if their opinion doesn't make a lot of sense with what you know about your symptoms. I know in saying this it might conflict with a trained medical opinion, but surgeons do pick and choose their cases. I have been in that spot of being passed over and surgeons and staff not paying attention to real spine related symptoms and not connecting them to my imaging and making excuses why they can't help me. I had learned enough about spine issues that I knew when I was not getting a good opinion. The surgeons at the top of their game did not have trouble understanding my case, but it took an opinion with a 6th surgeon until I found a great surgeon and went forward with surgery.
You may get different solutions with different manufacturers of spinal hardware because different surgeons have different preferences. They have to be trained in the use of the products by the manufacturers. Some offer artificial disc replacement but only if you have good bone quality and do not have instability. Some have PEEK cages which is a type on inert plastic. Some are titanium. Some cages screw in with angled screws and do not require a plate to be placed on the front of the spine. Some surgeons prefer to use a bone graft because it heals better (according to mine) and for me the best choice of all was no hardware, just the bone graft and I was careful until it fused. Some place rods and do a "curve correction" but that also removes the ability to move. There is going to be a compromise, but there is a choice with the understanding that not every patient is a good candidate for every solution. In the end, you have to educate yourself as best you can, and make an educated choice as to which surgeon you wish to hire for the job.
Think of it that way. They must earn the job not by pressuring a patient, but by explaining the benefit of the solution they propose vs the risks. Getting other opinions is normal and expected, and if a surgeon objects to it, you could look elsewhere. If a surgeon does good work, they should not worry about peer reviews. They are reviewed by insurance companies and Medicare anyway as well as online patient reviews. In order to get insurance clearance for surgery, they must submit their plan for review and approval in order to get paid by health insurance companies. Some surgeons are in private practice in their own facilities for profit. I talked to a high pressure surgeon in a group of 11 doctors who owned a surgical center, and he ran out of the room to avoid answering my questions. Then he mistook my leg pain as being caused by something else and told me to go to rehab and fix that first, then come back for spine surgery. I got e mail solicitations posing as surveys about my health for 2 years that were sniffing for business. Of course I couldn't fix my leg pain because it was caused by the spine problem in my neck and the 6th surgeon who was at Mayo recognized this.
Opinions matter. I knew enough to know which doctor gave me the best option and I had been reading about spine surgery for a few years. I also looked for any disciplinary action, and on the positive side, I read the surgeon's research papers to see if their interests were a good match for my case. If you found a surgeon who is a good match and is respected by their peers and want to proceed with that doctor, it is your choice. If you need more opinions to be able make an informed choice, get them. You have one chance to make a good choice. Not all surgeons are trying to sell you on surgery, and I was very suspicious of one who did that toward me. The surgeon at Mayo made an offer to help me and he didn't need to convince me of anything. I knew he was giving an honest evaluation of my condition and he would not have financial gain because of doing surgery because Mayo surgeons are employees and are not paid extra for doing surgeries.
Hi, Jennifer
I'm definitely taking this one step at a time, trying to educate myself as I go. I will admit, however, I'm torn between proceeding carefully and proceeding TOO carefully. That's a funny position to be in. This morning I had a phone chat with the surgeon's nurse. I asked two questions: (1) based on my one cervical MRI, what might the doctor call my condition? and (2) not yet having seen the imaging (I'll be getting in a few hours), what sort of surgery might the doctor propose (assuming he proposes surgery)? The answers: (1) cervical myelopathy (no surprise there), and (2) outpatient ACDF surgery. But the nurse cautioned me not to jump to any conclusions, not until the doctor has a chance to review today's imagining, and not until we meet again on 9/8.
As ever, Jennifer, thank you for your wise words!
Best wishes,
Ray
How are u doing now? It’s been 4 years since your surgery?
I know your response was some time ago. X-rays recently show severe cervical stenosis C-6-7 that has worsened since 2019.
I have had arm and hand pain on and off for years. It’s been tolerable with periodically taking Advil or Naproxen. I was recently prescribed 5 days of 20 mg prednisone. I didn’t take it but my chiro said it wouldn’t be a bad idea to get inflammation under control.
After realizing my condition had worsened (no one called to tell me - I read the results and took them to my chiro who interpreted them for me) I contacted my GP requesting he refers me to a specialist. He wrote back saying he was ordering an MRI. I think that’s wise.
My chiro mentioned one option if things worsen is surgery.
What kind of surgery did you have and how long did it take to recover? I care for young children who weigh up to around 30 pounds. I do pick them up sometimes. How long would it be before I could lift?
Please confirm your surgery was successful and if you’re still doing well.
I appreciate any info.
@jenniferhunter
Thank you for your detailed post. I was recently told my X-rays show severe cervical Foraminal stenosis. The next step is an MRI. My issues have been mostly arm and hand pain I’ve had on and off for years. X-rays show worsening since 2019.
I will know more after the MRI results. Surgery is scary but I don’t want to discount it if it ends up being necessary.
One thing I’d like to know is are there things we can do to either avoid or prolong the need for surgery without risking permanent damage.
I wonder if there are special pillows that are recommended. Also if there are helpful stretches and exercises that can help without causing harm.
@ray666
I was just told my X-rays show severe cervical Foraminal stenosis that has worsened since 2019.
I’d love to know the outcome of your situation. I’m reading old posts from 2021.
@pdray
I’m quite new to Mayo Clinic Connect. Was previously here for issues my husband has. Now here for my own cervical Foraminal stenosis that showed up in recent X-rays with worsening since 2019.
I’d like to stop it from getting worse. My GP suggests an MRI (after I asked for a specialist). If you’re interested I can copy paste his response which left me not feeling great.
I’m interested in trying alternatives to surgery if possible. How do people get to go to Mayo Clinic docs? I’m in WA state. I think I might have coverage for OHSU. I’m with Kaiser.
@isabelle7 Hi Isabelle. Thanks for your question. I think your MRI will show a lot more of what is going on. The foramen are the spaces between the vertebral bodies where the nerve roots exit the spinal cord. Those spaces get closed down by arthritic bone growth and discs that herniate into that space. Also a collapsing disc will narrow the space between vertebrae bones and narrow the foramen. The vertebrae rests on the disc with 80% of the weight there and 20% on the facet joints. When a disc collapses, it puts more pressure on the facets which then may become arthritic.
I had stenosis inside the central canal, and did not have stenosis in the foramen, but my disc had collapsed 50% of it's height, and if I was side bending my neck, I could cause a sharp burning pain because the bone could contact the nerve in that smaller space.
According to my surgeon, the best way to support the spine is by maintaining core strength. That is important to maintain proper posture. Bad slouching posture will put pressure on the discs and can help wear them out. With aging, discs dry out a bit on their own. If you have severe stenosis pinching a nerve, there probably isn't much you can do to offset that and try to keep good posture to minimize aggravating it. Your doctors will not be able to tell you exactly when permanent nerve damage is going to happen. If you have muscles that are wasting away and you are getting weaker, it may be from a compressed nerve and possible damage. Decompressing the nerve may help, but it is possible that you won't get all the muscle back, and it's possible that you could still be in pain.
I think you need more information. A physical therapist is a good source for knowing what is safe to do, and what is not, but they also need an evaluation of your spine before they can work on you. Based on the word "serious", you may get a recommendation for surgery, and the spine surgeon needs to evaluate and interpret the imaging results. Often they read it themselves and don't pay attention to the radiologists' report. Generally speaking, it's better to decompress a nerve early rather than later because the nerve may be able to recover and thus avoid permanent damage. That is a complex decision of course about your entire spine and general health.
@jenniferhunter
Thank you for your response. I’m waiting to get the MRI scheduled. We’ll know more then.
This is what was written in my cervical X-ray notes. I’d love to hear your thoughts:
FINDINGS/IMPRESSION:
AP, lateral, and oblique views of the cervical spine are provided for review.
No acute fracture.
Vertebral body heights are maintained.
Intervertebral disc heights are normal.
There is worsening anterior spurring spanning C5 and C6.
There is similar uncovertebral joint hypertrophy.
There is worsening, now severe narrowing of the right neuroforamina at C6-C7 secondary to progressing degenerative changes. The remaining levels on the right side have also shown worsening neuroforaminal stenosis.
The left side is stable, with narrowing noted at C6 to C7.
Prevertebral soft tissues are unremarkable.