DCIS first follow up since surgery in September.
Diagnosed with DCIS stage 0, grade 3. No lymph node involvement, lumpectomy, 5 weeks radiation. Very dense breasts. Had two consults both said lumpectomy, radiation, Anastrozole.
Yesterday had follow up diagnostic mammogram. I knew something was up as they kept calling me back for more scans.
They found "fatty Necrosis" under the lumpectomy scar.
That breast always hurts especially when I work out.
The other breast- now they see three areas of calcifications that they believe are benign, but they can change. This was not what I expected.
Another mammogram in six months and MRI.
I'm now second guessing myself as to whether I should have had a DMX instead of lumpectomy because of the breast density. I am having major anxiety regarding having to be "worried" all the time that my breasts are cooking up cancer.
Not sure how to process or prepare myself for the next exam. I hate knowing these calcifications are now in my other breast.
Anyone else go through this uncertainty?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.
Aww ok I see. Thank you for the great explanation! That makes sense.
I'm so sorry you went through all that. Hard to make these difficult decisions.
Thank you this is very helpful advice. Now I have to get the MRI and see what's next.
Mine was stage 0 as it was still in the milk ducts. After surgery the grade was 3. Pathology found the cancer was aggressive comedo type.
This new stuff they found is labeled a 3 because it is thought to be benign but can turn into same type I had before. My understanding is if it starts to change shape etc. it would become a 4. Not really sure how to understand it yet. I was so surprised by the findings I didn't really take it all in. I have to re-read the report, but we had to go out of town so will go over it again this weekend.
I see. Did they do a biopsy on the new stuff they found?
I was diagnosed with invasive carcinoma of no special type (ductal) grade 3, Stage I triple negative breast cancer. In learning more about DCIS, I see that every surgeon and oncologist have various medical recommendations and actions taken towards surgery and treatment.
Because I didn't want to have the uncertainty, as you have stated, I opted for having a double mastectomy. It was the best decision I could have made. The fat necrosis is not an issue but a side effect from the surgery.
My oncologist said it will go away but do not stop either exercise or physical therapy for strengthening (and yes, it hurts but movement is good). Radiation was not required. However, chemo was recommended (4 infusion treatments) however, due to the size and margins, I opted out of chemo. Because I did not have to have radiation, I was able to complete reconstructive breast surgery without incident.
Subsequently, I think the uncertainty will persist because the thought of the return elsewhere is probably in the back part of my mind. Nevertheless, I will not let this impact my quality of life. I refuse to!
Not sure but I would speak with the professionals after your test and think about having a mastectomy if possible. I have heard of persons who receive radiation doing reconstruction, but it is stated that the results may not be favorable, meaning shape, size, and appearance may be irregular.
Best to you in your journey!
Thank you for sharing your story. We all have to hear what the doctors say, research on our own, and come up with what we feel is best.
I did speak with my oncologist and the surgeon both today. The surgeon gave me more information on the calcifications that helped clear up some of my concerns.
Goad you are doing ok.
What is DMX ? I just got diagnosis of DCIS today so just beginning to do research.
Good to hear! Will you need any more surgery?
I understand your anxiety. I think the current recommendations make sense. I would wait before seriously considering a DMX.
You might want to consider genetic testing in case to try to rule out any genetic cause. In general, most women who have breast cancer DO NOT have a genetic cause, but genetic couseling might be useful