← Return to Gleason 6 (3+3) treatments
Discussion
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Aug 18 3:46pm | Replies (111)
Comment receiving replies
Replies to "I was told, the major reason for biopsy it to see if an MRI is needed...."
It's actually the other way around. If the Urologist is suspicious enough to consider a prostate biopsy (>20% rise in PSA over 1 year, payable nodule on DRE, etc), an MRI before the biopsy is helpful to determine if there are any suspicious areas to particularly target in addition to generalized biopsy of the entire gland. It is always preferable to begin with the least invasive test and then progress to biopsy.