← Return to Study shows HIFU noninferior to prostatectomy for localized prostate

Discussion

Study shows HIFU noninferior to prostatectomy for localized prostate

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Jun 25 10:10pm | Replies (14)
Comment receiving replies
@jcf58

I was diagnosed in April and was hoping for HIFU. I was ineligible due to the single lesion on the anterior side (can’t get enough energy to that area). I saw TULSA when researching Mayo and it looked like a great option. I am scheduled for July in Rochester. Really like the early data and I am very confident in the rigorous follow up plan.

Jump to this post

Replies to "I was diagnosed in April and was hoping for HIFU. I was ineligible due to the..."
Colleen Young, Connect Director | @colleenyoung | May 18 2:42pm

@jcf58, as you prepare for your trip to Mayo, you might find the discussions in this group helpful:
- Visiting Mayo Clinic Support Group https://connect.mayoclinic.org/group/traveling-to-mayo-clinic/

Loads of suggestions re hotels, things to do, what to expect and more.

VIEW AND REPLY
pdcar4756 | @pdcar4756 | Jun 23 9:09pm

I'm also going to Rochester. I want to know if I'm a candidate for Focal Therapy. My lesion is anterior so TULSA or cryo may be my likely options. Who is the urologist you are seeing at Rochester please?

VIEW AND REPLY
pdcar4756 | @pdcar4756 | Jun 23 9:10pm

I'm also going to Rochester. I want to know if I'm a candidate for Focal Therapy. My lesion is anterior so TULSA or cryo may be my likely options. Who is the urologist you are seeing at Rochester please? Are you doing TULSA at Rochester?

VIEW AND REPLY