← Return to PSA numbers after radiation with no ADT
DiscussionPSA numbers after radiation with no ADT
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Apr 8 8:29pm | Replies (14)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Bevana00007: I was diagnosed with the same pathological stage (favorable intermediate risk), after my mpMRI fusion..."
As an referenced add-on to my comment, this 2019 study, including Huang and Cooperberg, (“Decipher identifies men with otherwise clinically favorable-intermediate risk disease who may not be good candidates for active surveillance”) is particularly applicable regarding how important a F-IR man’s Decipher Score is for considering an AS decision making.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41391-019-0167-9
One conclusion quoted from the study:
“Men with NCCN F-IR PCa and a low or intermediate Decipher score had similar odds of AP (Adverse Pathology after RP) as men with NCCN VL/LR PCa. Therefore, incorporating Decipher into clinical decision-making, particularly for F-IR PCa, may be useful to safely expand the use of active surveillance.”
@handera
See you had similiar history. Was at intermediate then had Decipher and went to low risk. I agree the Decipher test is a must. It a much more accurate diagnosis of your cancer risks. I also had bone scan and PSMA which all showed no spread outside prostrate.
I had the proton radiation as it was recommended by both Mayo Clinic and UFHPTI as a cure (hate to use that word maybe best treatment outdome is better) and so far great PSA test.
It is interesting your loss of weight and lower PSA score. Maybe they should research that relationship.