Tulsa Pro - my initial treatment experience

Posted by bjroc @bjroc, Nov 28, 2023

I want to thank all for support on my recent prostate cancer treatment, Tulsa pro. I am very thankful to my wife and my daughter who helped out lots with support. I am thankful to Mayo for finally finding the extent of the problem with a transperineal biopsy. I am also very thankful to Dr Scionti in Sarasota for being a true expert for the Tulsa procedure. Tulsa leaves everything intact except for the prostate cancer tissue plus some tissue as a safety margin near it. It goes nowhere near sphincters and nerves. I was very glad to not have any extra prostatic cancer, or cancer in seminal vesicles, ducts, nerves etc. I did have PSMA scan showing this. We will just have to see if everything works out in the long run cancer wise.

What I had cancer wise
Originally in 2021 I had a small spot seen in transition zone. It got some 3+3 more toward back where they could reach via trans rectal biopsy (done at a local university), but they could not reach the anterior where most of it was in 2021. My 2023 Mayo done transperineal biopsy had one needle at the anterior transition zone with all Gleason 4, it was not a big spot (0.2 mm caught in needle). Keep in mind in 2021 further to back it had just Gleason 3. I am not going to get caught up in Gleason scores, I know what was sampled in past, and though one needle had 4 in the front/top of anterior it was just a tiny spot in this tumor and most toward posterior was not hit here in 2023. There was also a small 3+4 on one side seen now in 2023. My PSA headed up steadily during the 2.75 years on surveillance. My final prostate size before any treatment was 110 cc, and final PSA around 16.

What worked on biopsy, and what did not.
2021: Trans rectal in 2021 biopsy did not sample well, missed most of what is in anterior transition zone and one of my problem areas. But since then, I have had plenty of time to read on things like Tulsa pro, radiation types, and so on. So was glad to have the time.
2023: Mayo Transperineally done biopsy caught the problems.

Some things I learned about MRI
What I learned is that, for me at least, diffusion weighted MRI shows very clearly what docs need to see to treat. Regular contrast enhanced MRI left my doctors not that sure, sometimes even confused. Diffusion weighted MRI to me was crystal clear where things were and what needed to be treated. Only Dr Scionti seemed geared up for diffusion weighted MRI. That includes other places I asked for initial consult, and Mayo that I went to for a while – all geared up for contrast enhanced MRI only really seemed like.

Who does new kinds of treatments.
Mayo is top notch for advanced cancers that have spread, but I learned they are just starting out with other new treatments like Tulsa Pro. I liked Mayo’s proton as a possibility, but they have filled many slots for it, and sometimes it is hard to get through insurance from what they said to me. They also do everything under protocols, they have to develop those for these new treatments of any kind since everyone looks at Mayo. So in some ways they are behind a bit, having to do everything with a protocol instead of just looking out for what is best for one individual patient. Thus, I found I had to call around if I wanted anything new. Some places are better than others seemed like to me at calling places. The best I heard from was Dr Scionti in Sarasota.

Before Tulsa for me
Because the size of my prostate was large, and one needle had all Gl 4, we did bicalutamide and dutasteride for several months. They want that temperature up during Tulsa at the top so while I still met the Tulsa size limits we shrunk things a bit to be sure.

Travel
I had to travel to Sarasota, about a 22 hour drive for me. Found a nice Airbnb down there not too far away. I drove since date of coming back was uncertain. I wanted his office to take catheter out, others might fly and self remove catheter I understand, but I was unsure about that. It is good I rented an Airbnb for more than two weeks is all I can say.

Tulsa procedure
Obviously asleep, seemed to go well. They took out about 2/3 of the prostate tissue with the Tulsa pro. The before and after MRI done while asleep clearly shows the tumors on diffusion weighted MRI, and post procedure MRI with contrast show those same areas treated well and no longer there. Woke up with the bladder spasms a real lot, oxybutynin seemed to really help but it was hard to wake up with Foley catheter and the spasms. Next day the spasms were gone, but it was tough to sit. For ten days with Foley catheter, I watched old Dr Who, movies, and obviously just sleeping. A restful period is the best help, not having to do much was important for me at least. Foley catheter for ten days was no fun but it wasn’t as hard as I imagined perhaps.

Post catheter
Was a bit tough, I still had some inflammation perhaps worse than some get, plus there is scar tissue for up to 6 months, so it was hard to pee. Alpha blocker was a must just to pee. Another couple weeks brings me to now at this writing and it is a lot easier to pee. But it was a hard travel back. I suggest stay in an Airbnb for some time post procedure plus give plenty of time after catheter is out.

Future
We will see if this all worked on the cancer over next year or two, and on after that. Hoping for no recurrence of course.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Oh, ok. I did find the estimator with a Google search, and it let me select procedures, but eventually you're right, it asked for me to log in. Can you tell us which Mayo hospital/clinic you are going to use? If UCLA ends up telling me I have to pay $30K plus, I will be looking for alternate locations.
Thanks!

REPLY

Of course I had the procedure already in November '23, and haven't been back to Mayo since May '23, but I logged into the Mayo portal. I could not find Tulsa in a simple search, only cryoablation.

REPLY

Hey Bjroc,
Just wondering how you are progressing? I am very interested in having the Tulsa Pro procedure myself. Trying to get into UCLA. I had a biopsy done in early Jan. and have to wait until April 8th to get an MRI. After the MRI, UCLA will consult with me. There aren't very many men out there that are writing about their Tulsa treatment. Also, curious about your BPH symptoms. I'm currently taking Terazosin twice a day and have been for a few years. It works with no side effects, but it would be nice not to have to take it. Did they ablate your urethra or did you regain flow because your prostate shrank? I had a phone conversation with UCLA (an intake contact) who said Tulsa would be covered by original Medicare, but since then I have sent emails back and forth, and they won't confirm or deny that, so I am skeptical.

REPLY
@paulcalif

Hey Bjroc,
Just wondering how you are progressing? I am very interested in having the Tulsa Pro procedure myself. Trying to get into UCLA. I had a biopsy done in early Jan. and have to wait until April 8th to get an MRI. After the MRI, UCLA will consult with me. There aren't very many men out there that are writing about their Tulsa treatment. Also, curious about your BPH symptoms. I'm currently taking Terazosin twice a day and have been for a few years. It works with no side effects, but it would be nice not to have to take it. Did they ablate your urethra or did you regain flow because your prostate shrank? I had a phone conversation with UCLA (an intake contact) who said Tulsa would be covered by original Medicare, but since then I have sent emails back and forth, and they won't confirm or deny that, so I am skeptical.

Jump to this post

All of it takes time, you are doing fine on time as far as I can tell, it took me 6 months to go from biopsy saying I needed treatment to the actual treatment but I did two months of shrinking (dutasteride) because they wanted it a bit smaller for extra effectiveness. From urethra to lesion has to be less than 30 mm, I was at 28 mm maximum, but they really wanted to down below 25 mm for most effectiveness for the Tulsa Pro.

Before the Tulsa I had a pretty big prostate but my BPH symptoms were only medium so I didn't have to take any alpha blockers but I was getting to the point I needed them. I mean I had to go too often, and sometimes it was incomplete empty but was still tolerable. Another few months out and I might have needed a prescription.

During the procedure they don't ablate the urethra, they keep that in tact as it is the path for the Tulsa probe. It uses two emitters on the probe and where the two beams cross it ablates so the beams don't cross in the urethra but out at where the lesions are. For two full months I had to use alpha blockers and it was pretty heavy need for them. I was able to drop them at that point. This past weekend I was just thinking this is the best I have pee'd in ten years so things still improving. I am pretty sure the prostate has gone way down in size but won't have an MRI till 1 year out.

Can't say on payments or coverage, I had been saving expecting to do something like this.

REPLY

What a great reply, thanks! Glad to hear you're doing well. I knew the probe is chilled and that they cross the sound wave beams to ablate the areas of concentration, but I've also seen where they ablate the ureatha for BPH, though I haven't seen that done with with Tulsa. I have read that BPH symptoms can be treated with Tulsa. Anyway, great info. thanks again for sharing. Keep us updated on your PSA levels, you're a bit of a pioneer! 🙂

REPLY

Has anyone heard about the center in Alpharetta GA that performs the TULSA PRO procedure?

REPLY
@klk69

Has anyone heard about the center in Alpharetta GA that performs the TULSA PRO procedure?

Jump to this post

REPLY

Got an MRI and second opinion from Joe Busch. One of most experienced in the country with TULSA. Great reputation reading MRIs. Thankfully still on active surveillance so haven’t needed further treatment.

REPLY

Hey Bjroc,
Your about 4-1/2 months post treatment right? How are you doing now? Any side effects?

REPLY
@paulcalif

Hey Bjroc,
Your about 4-1/2 months post treatment right? How are you doing now? Any side effects?

Jump to this post

Just past 5 months. I find very low side effects. I'll tell you all the bad side effects that I have so it can help make decisions for anyone, for me they are not significant.

Beforehand I used cialis, I still do, I don't think there is a big drop of any kind so about the same before and now. If you need it before you still will. Some might need to add it, not sure on that, all I can attest to is I am about the same. I don't need much cialis but haven't seen a need to increase it either.

Ejaculate will be less, for sure less. But there is some if you don't get the 100% tulsa pro treatment. So I am not totally dry, but some who get the 100% are for sure I understand.

Especially for the first months every once in a while you can pee a tiny when not expecting, when you laugh or stand up a certain way. For first month I used Depends but it becomes less and less. It is very rare now at 5 months, but we all vary, some might get it longer or none.

Most of the rest I have mentioned, first month I had some pain in perineum that made certain chairs harder to sit and so on.

All in all, I am real happy and feel it some of the best money I have spent. I looked at a 2024 loaner car when mine was in shop the other day, it was a $43K car, lots more than I spent on Tulsa pro. I didn't buy the car, but anyway, things cost lots more than Tulsa for sure.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.