Center of Excellence questions/recommendations for CA resident

Posted by greg52 @greg52, Feb 23 8:41pm

Recently diagnosed with PC (details below).
Current recommendation is to have the robotic radical prostatectomy.
In my research here, everyone is adamant that you are treated at a "Center of Excellence". Starting my research on this so not even sure what this means yet.
- Are there specific hospitals/treatment centers that have been given this title?
- Is there a recommended "center of excellence" for me here in the Bay Area/Central Valley CA that specializes in prostate cancer evaluation/treatment?
- Am I rolling the dice by just having it done through my health care provider (has performed about 150 robot radical prostatectomies)?
- Is medical insurance less likely to cover or will it cover less if I opt for treatment at a better known/more experienced "center of excellence" facility?

I am younger (53), so maximizing the odds for minimal after effects from treatment is also very important to me.

Thanks so much for your input/help.

A few details of my diagnosis below:
Diagnosis:
1. Left crossing midline to right apex to mid gland peripheral zone lesion
#1 : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6 (Grade Group 1); in 1 of
1 cores, (4mm, 55%).
2. Left crossing midline to right apex to mid gland peripheral zone lesion
#2 : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6 (Grade Group 1); in 1 of
3 cores, (1mm, 5%).
3. Left crossing midline to right apex to mid gland peripheral zone lesion
#3 : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6 (Grade Group 1); in 1 of
2 cores, (2mm, 10%).
4. Left crossing midline to right apex to mid gland peripheral zone lesion
#4 : Benign non-keratinizing squamous mucosa and stroma.
5. Left crossing midline to right apex to mid gland peripheral zone lesion
#5 : Benign stromal tissue.
6. Left lateral base : Benign stromal tissue.
7. Left lateral mid : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6
(Grade Group 1); in 1 of 3 cores, (2mm, 20%).
8. Left lateral apex : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6
(Grade Group 1); in 1 of 3 cores, (3mm, 15%).
9. Left medial base : Benign prostatic tissue.
10. Left medial mid : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6 (Grade
Group 1); in 1 of 4 cores, (5.5mm, 40%).
11. Left medial apex : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6 (Grade
Group 1); in 1 of 3 cores, (3mm, 25%).
12. Right lateral base : Benign stromal tissue.
13. Right lateral mid : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+3 = 6
(Grade Group 1); in 1 of 4 cores, (2.5mm, 10%).
14. Right lateral apex : Benign stromal tissue.
15. Right medial base : Benign stromal tissue.
16. Right medial mid : Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Gleason score 3+4 = 7 (Grade
Group 2); in 1 of 4 cores, (3mm, 25%).
17. Right medial apex : Benign stromal tissue.

ASSESSMENT: 53 year old male with history of no medical issues who has intermediate risk prostate cancer (PSA 8.6, 3+4 = 7 in 8/17 cores, cT1c.
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate from 12/18/2023 showed a prostatic volume of 29.1 cc. No pelvic lymphadenopathy. Mild capsular bulge at the left neurovascular bundle zone. No skeletal lesions.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@gently

50 GY and over are more likely to damage the urethera. ADT would sensitize the tumor cells to the radiation. Protocol with MRI guided SBRT is 40GY in five treatments. It sounds like you are in very good hands at UCSF. If you haven't had genetic testing for the tumor, that could add guidance. Most are using decipher. But, I think it is good to get second opinions satisfied or not. It is fairly easy with zoom and with the prevalence of Epic and its
access to your records. I can recommend Hoag, City of Hope Lennar, and UCLA for second opinions.
Best wishes

Jump to this post

Thank you.

The other RO I met wants to preform LD Brachytherapy. Permanent seed placement. Dr Kurtzman, Who is a LD Brachytherpy expert I believe. this treatment option also is highly effective. Maybe even more curative than SBRT I have read

Thoughts? Difficult to choose between radiation options

REPLY
@jarjlb2

Anyone have there cancer treated at university, California San Francisco? UCSF

I met with a radiation oncologist at UCSF and he is recommending SBRT with a total of 38 Gy radiation over just for treatments

I am Gleason 3+4. Localized prostate cancer. So he is not recommending any additional treatment. No brachytherapy boost or hormone treatment

Total dose radiation seems low to me. I hear that something closer to 50 Gy is more curative

Jump to this post

jarjlb2,
how is it that you find the best doctors? Kurtzman would be THE LD brachytherapy expert.
This treatment would be the most protective of surrounding tissue. Ask how close they you be to the nerve bundle? Ask about the long term BCR with ld brachytherapy.
Have you had the generic serum lab for cancer.
With as much information as you have given, I'd choose SBRT, but not at UCSF. I'd go for the MRidian Viewray. It will be interesting to see your PSMA. Could switch things up a little if it is even more definitive on the nerve bundle involvement.

REPLY
@jarjlb2

Anyone have there cancer treated at university, California San Francisco? UCSF

I met with a radiation oncologist at UCSF and he is recommending SBRT with a total of 38 Gy radiation over just for treatments

I am Gleason 3+4. Localized prostate cancer. So he is not recommending any additional treatment. No brachytherapy boost or hormone treatment

Total dose radiation seems low to me. I hear that something closer to 50 Gy is more curative

Jump to this post

You can search me under the Prostate Board. My boyfriend was treated at UCSF, by Dr. Peter Carroll with stellar results. Surgery August of last summer, 2023.

REPLY
@di341

You can search me under the Prostate Board. My boyfriend was treated at UCSF, by Dr. Peter Carroll with stellar results. Surgery August of last summer, 2023.

Jump to this post

Thank you

REPLY

Thanks so much to everyone for your input. I will certainly seek out 2nd and 3rd opinions. Likely from UCSF and UCI. But my next question is cost. As this treatment would be done outside my healthcare network if I go through a center for excellence, I'd love to get some idea of how much more the treatment/procedure would be going to UCSF/UCI?
So any insight/guidance on that front would also be helpful. As a 53 year old/semi-retired man (recently laid off after 30 years in the semiconductor industry), I pay for my own health insurance.

I guess I just call UCSF and tell them I would like to have a consult?

Thanks again to all for your past and continued support.

REPLY
@gently

Greg52, nice question about Centers of Excellence. There is no national standard. The designation comes from various sources. It can come from insurance companies as a cost saving measure, which I find frightening.

More importantly, it sounds as though you've spoken with an oncological surgeon. If you haven't yet you might want to consult with a radiation oncologist and a chemical oncologist. The skilled usually recommend their speciality because they are doing what they believe in. On the other hand you may be thinking what many people think with a cancer diagnosis--get it out of me. If you've decided on surgery then find the best surgeon. I wouldn't risk this surgery with someone less experienced because the area is so sensitive to damage
For the same reason I'd check out radiation before deciding on surgery.
If you can manage, don't consider distance as an obstacle. You can get initial appointments by zoom. UCLA is only several hours from the central valley --Kishan has such a reputation that other ROs recommend him. Percy Lee at Lennar Irvine Cancer Center is another great choice for radiation. Rossi at CA Proton in La Jolla has the most experience with prostate cancer--no surgeries there.
Avoiding surgery, I've no information on surgeons.
Anyone out there with an excellent surgeon in California? We could use some names.

Jump to this post

I have an appointment with Percy LEE Monday, March 18th. Lennar center is just 15 minutes from my house. But when I looked up his experience is in Lung cancer not prostate cancer!
Do you have any information that he treats PC patients often?
I also have an appointment Kishan at UCLA next Friday at UCLA, about 55 miles from my house, not a problem.
I have G9 PC with no Metastasis from PSMA Pet scan just yesterday.

REPLY
@greg52

Thanks so much to everyone for your input. I will certainly seek out 2nd and 3rd opinions. Likely from UCSF and UCI. But my next question is cost. As this treatment would be done outside my healthcare network if I go through a center for excellence, I'd love to get some idea of how much more the treatment/procedure would be going to UCSF/UCI?
So any insight/guidance on that front would also be helpful. As a 53 year old/semi-retired man (recently laid off after 30 years in the semiconductor industry), I pay for my own health insurance.

I guess I just call UCSF and tell them I would like to have a consult?

Thanks again to all for your past and continued support.

Jump to this post

Just a laymen here but with 12 years of being part of this journey, I think a consult with a medical team (oncologist, radiation, surgeon) might be 0.5 hours for prepare time and 1.0 hours for actual meeting, so 1.5 hours per professional for a total of 4.5 hours. At a bill rate of $500 and adding on some additional expenses, perhaps $2,000 out of pocket. Even if this is off by 25%, it serves as general order of magnitude, and relative to the cost of a RALP.

A big part of this is education and also bed-side manner. You may find that as you get more knowledge base and comfort with questions and answers, the professional in your network may be a really good candidate.

Depending on what state you are in, some affordable health care plans have a Medicaid option that provides free health care if you are unemployed. It usually isn't the most robust package, but that might be an angle to look into.

keep the faith

REPLY

I am going to UCLA Westwood and I see Nick Donan. I would like to hear your option about Kishan. Also G 9 here.

REPLY

avall,
Percy Lee has more experience with thoracic cancers, though I think that list may not be current. His education is stellar. And I found him fascinating. He had the Mridian.
Kishan is confidently exhuberant. He says he can get close to the 2mm with the advances in imaging. The only trouble was that he was competing against his video. He worked with Percy Lee at UCLA.
With the drs in new york and phoenix and I felt that they were surprised that anyone would walk away from Kishan. He gets praise from every corner. You may have a more difficult decision because I think soon he'll have the Viewray up and running soon.
I'm very happy with Dr, Lee. I would want each of the doctors to discuss the particulars of your tumor.
I have the idea that with the MRidian Viewray there is protocol 40Gy in doses of 8 with protection that the urethra doesn't receive more than the 40.
Lee treats prostate every weekday but I don't know how many times a day, nor do I know how long he has been treating prostate.
Also, ask about orgovyx if you aren't on ADT. There is some noise about Cialis 5mg for vascular protection during radiation.
No metastasis. Hooray!
Best

REPLY

Ava11, last of 5 Monday morning with Percy Lee. Very happy with Lee. You must have been there in the afternoon. It will be interesting to see what Kishan recommends on Friday. You'll be impressed, again.
You have such great choices.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.