← Return to Vitamin D intake and PSA reduction

Discussion

Vitamin D intake and PSA reduction

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Mar 10 4:07pm | Replies (14)

Comment receiving replies
@desertfalcon1954

This is what I’ve read

Jump to this post


Replies to "This is what I’ve read"

The two clinical trials, cited in your clip, can be found at these websites:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387395/ (April 2012)
This trial included 44 participants who took 4000 IU of Vitamin D daily for 1 year.
Results:
"No significant changes in PSA levels were observed. However, 24 of 44 subjects (55%) showed a decrease in the number of positive cores or decrease in Gleason score; five subjects (11%) showed no change; 15 subjects (34%) showed an increase in the number of positive cores or Gleason score."

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/98/4/1498/2536841? (May 2013)
This trial involved 66 PCa patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy. They were randomly placed into three groups and given vitamin D orally, once per day, for 3 to 8 weeks, up to the day before their RP surgery.
1) 400 IU (10 μg)
2) 10 000 IU (250 μg)
3) 40 000 IU (1000 μg).
Results:
- Groups 2) & 3) had lower blood serum levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH is a measure of PCa bone metastases) and PSA (see baseline/final chart attached).
- "In conclusion, our clinical trial data support the hypothesis that prostatic in vivo vitamin D metabolism can be modulated by high oral vitamin D dosing. Furthermore, the decrease in Ki67 labeling and modest declines in serum PSA and PTH with higher prostate calcitriol achieved with vitamin D doses (10 000 and 40 000 IU/d) suggest a potential clinical benefit. Lastly, the vitamin D doses (400–40 000 IU/d) were well tolerated by PCa patients without signs of toxicity."

Years ago I was found to have a Vitamin D deficiency. I currently take a 5000 IU Vitamin D softgel capsule daily, maybe I should increase that to 10,000 IU/day???

According to clinical trials, the observed effect of Vitamin D on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction is noteworthy. However, it is essential to note that it does not have a significant impact on the Ki-67 index, which holds relevance for prostate tissue, as an elevated Ki-67 index may signal a less favourable prognosis for the disease. Additionally, vigilant monitoring for potential side effects, particularly hypercalcemia, is crucial. To comprehensively understand the positive and negative outcomes associated with a substantial dose of Vitamin D in reducing PSA, further extensive clinical trials are imperative.